- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:04:27 -0600
- To: joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie
- Cc: "Al Gilman" <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, "Janina Sajka" <janina@a11y.org>, "Michael Cooper" <cooper@w3.org>, "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Josh, Thanks for the report. One thing that I would like to document in the Wiki is the design notes sub-point on cyclic referencing. You mentioned: > There has bee some concern voiced about the potential for cyclic > references if chained headers were allowed in the specification. This > seems to some degree to be unfounded. The relationship between a > header and any corresponding chained/nested/ conceptual header that > follows it is uni-directional and not bi-directional. This also > follows if the id of a <td> cell is to be referenced from a chained > header. How is this point semi-founded? How can it be addressed and resolved as either "founded" or "unfounded"? I thought that detail had been discussed previously and had been resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Sep/0457.html In order to make progress on this issue, it would be good to declare this point one way or the other. Thanks again. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 15:05:03 UTC