- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:19:43 +0100
- To: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2008, at 02:13, Dan Connolly wrote: > >> The process for substantive changes to the charter involves >> a 4 week review by the representatives of the W3C membership. >> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/activities.html#ActivityModification >> >> We have done none of those in this WG. >> >> The most recent change was clearly editorial. CVS says >> Mike "added some IDs". > [...] >> --- WWW/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html 2007/03/07 14:51:58 1.21 >> +++ WWW/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html 2007/04/18 10:48:03 1.22 >> @@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ >> >> <p> >> This group will maintain and produce incremental >> - revisions to the HTML specification, which includes >> - the series of specifications previously published as XHTML >> version >> - 1. Both XML and 'classic HTML' syntaxes will be produced.</p> >> + revisions to the HTML specification. >> + Both XML and 'classic HTML' syntaxes will be produced.</p> > > > This one is a pretty substantive change in practice. It is. Not sure about the specifics of the W3C process, but I would assume that this change of wording requires new approval. For the record, <http://web.archive.org/web/20070324223056/http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#scope> shows the relevant section as of March 23, 2007. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 08:20:24 UTC