Ian Hickson wrote: > ... >> If they are not final-with-implementations, then there may well be >> feedback and editing changes that Nikunj is offering to deal with. > > Given the small amount of work that is involved here, it really wouldn't > help us move the spec along faster. > ... But it would result in a smaller HTML5 spec, and potentially that new spec to be published earlier. >> If they are final-with-implementations, and can't really be changed, >> then it makes sense to split them out and publish them > > I agree, and would be happy to do that once we have less pressing matters. It seems that there is disagreement about what matters are pressing. I'd recommend that Nikunj makes a concrete proposal (in particular what parts to extract) to the list and the chairs, which we can then review and decide upon. >> so people won't waste time suggesting implausible changes. > > That hasn't been a problem so far for those sections (with the exception > of some suggestions from Nikunj himself). We're talking about an editor, not an author. I wouldn't expect the editor Nikunj to make non-editorial changes without the support of the WG. > ... BR, JulianReceived on Sunday, 23 November 2008 11:40:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:39 UTC