public-html@w3.org from November 2008: by author

Al Gilman
- request for input on organizing (ARIA, HTML)-to-API work (Friday, 28 November)
- Re: your action? about @headers etc. (Monday, 17 November)
- micro-process on @headers and friends [was: Re: how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works)] (Friday, 7 November)
- how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works) (Tuesday, 4 November)
Alexandre Alapetite
- Re: Question about @id validation in XHTML5 (Sunday, 16 November)
- Question about @id validation in XHTML5 (Sunday, 16 November)
Andi Sidwell
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
Andrew Fedoniouk
- Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 15 November)
Aryeh Gregor
- Re: Selectors Tests (Wednesday, 12 November)
Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
Ben Millard
- Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: your action? about @headers etc. (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: your action? about @headers etc. (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion (Friday, 14 November)
- Updating the HTMLWG Web Pages (Friday, 7 November)
- Re: <q> Research & Conclusions (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: Final thoughts on <q> (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: <q> Research & Conclusions (Wednesday, 5 November)
Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
Brad Kemper
- Re: Selectors Tests (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: Selectors Tests (Wednesday, 12 November)
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 6258] New: Changing the encoding doesn't cover non-idempotent navigation (Saturday, 29 November)
- [Bug 6257] New: Please specify document.write()-safe points in the parse (Saturday, 29 November)
- [Bug 6256] New: Mutation event behavior on document.open() unspecified (Saturday, 29 November)
- [Bug 6254] New: xref errors in the <input> summary table (Thursday, 27 November)
- [Bug 6253] New: <input> bookkeeping aren't consistent (Thursday, 27 November)
- [Bug 6236] New: scroll bar placement in frames (Wednesday, 19 November)
- [Bug 6216] New: <script> in <select> (Tuesday, 11 November)
- [Bug 6214] New: insertRow without arguments (Monday, 10 November)
- [Bug 6213] New: Noscript content model with script allows fragment parse errors (Monday, 10 November)
Cameron McCormack
- HTMLSelectElement.add() (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Monday, 17 November)
- [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Monday, 17 November)
Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Authoring Guide (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Selectors API: New Last Call (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: [whatwg] Context help in Web Forms (Friday, 7 November)
Chris Double
- Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate (Thursday, 20 November)
Chris Wilson
- RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Tuesday, 11 November)
- Likely regrets for Thursday's call (Tuesday, 11 November)
Dan Connolly
- charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
Daniel Glazman
- Re: what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)
- what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)
Daniel Schattenkirchner
- Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Sunday, 9 November)
- Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Saturday, 8 November)
Dave Singer
- Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Thursday, 27 November)
David Orchard
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
Dean Edridge
- Language Specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)
Dmitry Turin
- Prompt, please, into which door i must to knock (was: budget to implement HTML6) (Wednesday, 12 November)
- budget to implement HTML6 (Thursday, 6 November)
- Re: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) (Thursday, 6 November)
- Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
- budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re[2]: budget to implement HTML6 (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)
- budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)
Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
- Re: metadata content (Wednesday, 19 November)
- metadata content (Tuesday, 18 November)
Edward O'Connor
- Re: Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" (Monday, 17 November)
Elliotte Harold
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
Eric Carlson
- HTMLMediaElement - detecting startup hysterisis (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
- setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
- HTMLMediaElement defaultPlaybackRate and playbackRate (Saturday, 22 November)
- HTMLMediaElement readyState (Thursday, 20 November)
- bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate (Thursday, 20 November)
fantasai
- Re: Selectors Tests (Thursday, 13 November)
Gavin Sharp
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
Gez Lemon
- Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)
Hallvord R. M. Steen
- Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Wednesday, 5 November)
Henri Sivonen
- Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Sunday, 30 November)
- Mutation events and document.open() (Saturday, 29 November)
- Re: document.write from event handlers (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: document.write from event handlers (was: Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node) (Thursday, 27 November)
- document.write from event handlers (was: Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node) (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Line breaks in the placeholder attribute (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
- document.close() in document.write() (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: metadata content (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Point at which script blocks the parser (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Re-entrant invocation of the tree builder (Monday, 17 November)
- Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Question about @id validation in XHTML5 (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
- Escaping text span and character references (Sunday, 16 November)
- Nesting optgroups (Sunday, 16 November)
- Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" (Sunday, 16 November)
- "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Monday, 10 November)
- Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Sunday, 9 November)
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
Ian Hickson
- Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Sunday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg] Citing multiple <blockquote> elements in HTML5 (Sunday, 30 November)
- <q> omnibus (Sunday, 30 November)
- Re: Ratios Do Not Return Errors (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) (Sunday, 30 November)
- Re: Authoring requirements and default values with progress and meter (Sunday, 30 November)
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Saturday, 29 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Database section feedback (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Re: Text presentation of image maps with <object> (detailed review of Semantics) (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Image map feedback (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Re: Web Forms 2 input type=email (was Re: autosubmit) (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: metadata content (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Contexts in which <menu> is allowed (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: checked attribute on non-radio, non-checkbox commands (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Web sockets: typo (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: State transitions for media elements (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: Buffered bytes for media elements (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: what's the language of a document ? (Thursday, 13 November)
- RE: Workers (Wednesday, 12 November)
- RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: willValidate and image controls (Tuesday, 11 November)
- Re: HTMLOptionElement constructor (Tuesday, 11 November)
- Re: Events and disabled form controls (Friday, 7 November)
- Re: Nested forms (Thursday, 6 November)
- Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Wednesday, 5 November)
- Re: Conformance requirements for accept-charset (Saturday, 1 November)
- Re: External conformance dependency in forms (Saturday, 1 November)
- Re: Space in pseudo-BNF for accept attribute for file upload controls (Saturday, 1 November)
- Re: <q> vs <p> (Saturday, 1 November)
- Re: Final thoughts on <q> (Saturday, 1 November)
- RE: <q> (Saturday, 1 November)
James Graham
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 16 November)
Jim Jewett
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- English analogy [was: Re: Splitting up the spec] (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec - archive info (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- video: various width/height attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
- markup spec [was: Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification?] (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
Jirka Kosek
- Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
- Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
- Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
John Kemp
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
Jonas Sicking
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Wednesday, 26 November)
- Re: Authoring Guide (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: [Bug 6214] New: insertRow without arguments (Tuesday, 11 November)
Joshue O Connor
- Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Monday, 24 November)
Julian Reschke
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 27 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) (Thursday, 6 November)
Justin James
- RE: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
- RE: Workers (Thursday, 13 November)
- RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text (Wednesday, 12 November)
- RE: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) (Thursday, 6 November)
Kornel Lesinski
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
Lachlan Hunt
- [html-author] Authoring Guide Progress Update (Friday, 28 November)
- Re: Authoring Guide (was: Splitting up the spec) (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Wednesday, 19 November)
Laura Carlson
- Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)
Lee Kowalkowski
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
- Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
- The compatibility DOCTYPE (Tuesday, 11 November)
Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Monday, 10 November)
Marco Neumann
- Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)
Mark Baker
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Monday, 17 November)
- An HTML language specification (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: budget to implement HTML6 (Tuesday, 4 November)
Michael A. Puls II
- Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events (Wednesday, 12 November)
Michael(tm) Smith
- Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Thursday, 20 November)
- How the markup spec is put together [was: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal?] (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
- "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
- Summary: HTML WG October 2008 face-to-face meeting (Wednesday, 12 November)
- {minutes} 2008-10-24 f2f meeting (day two) (Friday, 7 November)
- {minutes} 2008-10-23 f2f meeting (day one) (Friday, 7 November)
- no telcon this week (Thursday, 6 November)
Nikunj Mehta
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)
Philip Jägenstedt
- Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: HTMLMediaElement readyState (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: State transitions for media elements (Sunday, 16 November)
Philip Taylor
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: document.close() in document.write() (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Minor form enctype errors (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)
- Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes (Tuesday, 11 November)
- Parsing problem with misnested tags (Tuesday, 11 November)
Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- [Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification] (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: markup spec [was: Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification?] (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Language Specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: Selectors Tests (Wednesday, 12 November)
Pierre-Olivier Latour
- Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes (Monday, 24 November)
Rob Sayre
- Re: An HTML language specification (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Friday, 21 November)
Robert J Burns
- Re: PFWG report on @headers status (Tuesday, 25 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Sunday, 16 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Friday, 14 November)
Roy T. Fielding
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Thursday, 20 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Tuesday, 18 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Monday, 17 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (Saturday, 15 November)
Simon Pieters
- Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 12 November)
- Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Tuesday, 11 November)
Smylers
- Re: An HTML language specification (Sunday, 23 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Friday, 21 November)
Steven Faulkner
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Friday, 14 November)
- Re: how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works) (Friday, 7 November)
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Thursday, 13 November)
Toby A Inkster
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Monday, 24 November)
- Re: Splitting up the spec (Saturday, 22 November)
- Re: An HTML language specification (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec (Wednesday, 19 November)
- Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) (Thursday, 13 November)
Travis Leithead
- RE: Almost Standards Mode still needed? (Tuesday, 11 November)

public-html@w3.org from November 2008 by author