- From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:38:39 +0000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, Elliotte Harold wrote: >> Error correction is much more problematic. >> >> In essence, the path taken by HTML 5 is that there is no such thing as a >> document which is in error. All byte streams become legal HTML >> documents. That's not how they phrase it, but that's the effect. > > How is this different from what HTML4 did? HTML4 said "this is what is > valid, and everything else should work too". Where did it say this ? Philip TAYLOR
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 07:39:23 UTC