- From: Ben Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:29:31 -0000
- To: "Michael\(tm\) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: "HTMLWG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Aaron Leventhal" <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
>From these minutes: > <DanC> (just briefly, who has the ball on headers?) > <DanC> (the actions listed in > <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/20> seem stale. ) > <MikeSmith> Joshue: we are talking with PF about @headers and discussing > how to move this along a little farther > <DanC> (hmm... so it sounds like anybody/somebody/nobody has the ball.) I will be comparing the Smart Headers algorithm to what's currently in the spec and documenting the differences between them. On Thursday 23rd November 2008: <http://www.w3.org/2008/10/23-html-wg-minutes.html#item06> [[[ BenMillard: [...] I think an Action item would be to document the diff between the spec and Smart Headers algorithm ]]] My words were more like "I'll take an Action item [to do this]" but that may have been hard to hear. Seems I don't have authority to Raise an Action for myself. When I go here and supply my W3C credentials: <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/new> I get this message (sic): [[[ Unauthorized Editing is restricted to participants to the HTML Weekly ]]] If someone Raises the Action on my behalf then Tracker will better reflect the current stage of work. Since my funding runs out on 1st December 2008, that seems like a sensible deadline. I'm treating this work as a priority because of that deadline and because Gecko is somewhat interested in mapping HTML table header associations to accessibility APIs: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441445> -- Ben 'Cerbera' Millard <http://projectcerbera.com/web/study/>
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 08:30:40 UTC