- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:30:44 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Jim Jewett wrote: > > > > Are you proposing splitting just the DOM, or the DOM and the > > implementation requirements? > > I am not certain that I understand what you mean by "implementation > requirements." The rules that apply to implementations, like how to parse an HTML file, how to submit a form, how CSS and HTML interact, how the DOM should be implemented, etc. > Assuming that I do correctly understand what you mean by "implementation > requirements", then those should also be split from the vocabulary -- > but it might well make sense to keep them with the DOM. Why would authors who write scripts be ok with reading a spec that included implementation details when authors who don't write scripts wouldn't be ok with reading a spec that included scripting details? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 23 November 2008 06:31:20 UTC