Friday, 1 August 2003
Thursday, 31 July 2003
- Re: resources and URIs
- Action NW 2003/07/21: Rewrite 3.2.2.3.
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: Information resources
- Re: Information resources
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: httpRange-14
Wednesday, 30 July 2003
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- RE: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- RE: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: HTTP Range Middle ground?
- HTTP Range Middle ground?
- Re: Information resources
Tuesday, 29 July 2003
- Re: Information resources
- Re: Information resources
- RE: TAG telecon, information resources
- TAG telecon, information resources
- Re: httpRange-14
- RE: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: Information resources
- Re: Information resources
- Re: Information resources
- Re: Information resources
Monday, 28 July 2003
- Re: Information resources
- [Minutes] 28 July 2003 TAG teleconf (URI/Resource/Representation/httpRange-14)
- Information resources
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: proxies was: Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: proxies was: Re: resources and URIs
- proxies was: Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- RE: httpRange-14
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- RE: [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- RE: language modularity, with semantics
- RE: httpRange-14
- RE: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: The right question (HTTPRange-14)
- The right question (HTTPRange-14)
- Re: httpRange-14
- RE: What a URI means, was Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: What a URI means, was Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: What a URI means, was Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- RE: httpRange-14
Sunday, 27 July 2003
Saturday, 26 July 2003
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web"
Friday, 25 July 2003
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: httpRange-14
- RE: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web"
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web"
- Re: httpRange-14
- RE: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- RE: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web"
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web"
- [Agenda] 28 July 2003 TAG teleconf (httpRange-14)
- RE: httpRange-14
- RE: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: What a URI means, was Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- RE: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: What a URI means, was Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: httpRange-14
- Re: httpRange-14
- RE: On subsetting XML... PLEASE DISREGARD
- RE: On subsetting XML...
- Re: On subsetting XML...
Thursday, 24 July 2003
- httpRange-14
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Requests for Comments or Request for Comments ?
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: terminological clarification
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: terminological clarification
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: Erratum notification: XLink, href, escaping
- Erratum notification: XLink, href, escaping
- Re: resources and URIs
Wednesday, 23 July 2003
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Minor editorial items in Architecture document (Part 1)
- terminological clarification
- Re: What a URI means, was Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- URI space: a definition
Tuesday, 22 July 2003
- What a URI means, was Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST" available
- Re: resources, denotations and lattices
- RE: resources, denotations and lattices
- resources, denotations and lattices
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- RE: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: the term "identifies"
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- RE: [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- RE: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
Monday, 21 July 2003
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: language modularity, with semantics
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: language modularity, with semantics
- language modularity, with semantics
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- [httpRange-14] each HTTP URI in RDF names a ResponsePoint
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- the term "identifies"
- Differing interpretations
- RE: [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- RE: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- Re: [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: [httpRange-14] levels of representation
Sunday, 20 July 2003
- Re: [httpRange-14] levels of representation
- Re: [httpRange-14] levels of representation
- [httpRange-14] levels of representation
- abstract vs information resources was Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
Saturday, 19 July 2003
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
Friday, 18 July 2003
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- commentary on webarch 07/16
Thursday, 17 July 2003
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- RE: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- RE: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- RE: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- RE: resources and URIs
- Re: "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- "On the Web" vs "On the Semantic Web" (was Re: resources and URIs)
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- [httpRange-14] empiricism was Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Arch Doc: 16 July 2003 Editor's Draft
- Re: Comments on June 27th 2003 Web Arch WD
Wednesday, 16 July 2003
- RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- RE: Arch Doc: 15 July 2003 Editor's Draft
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: resources and URIs
- RE: Arch Doc: 15 July 2003 Editor's Draft
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Comments on June 27th 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- RE: Arch Doc: 15 July 2003 Editor's Draft
- RE: Arch Doc: 15 July 2003 Editor's Draft
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Arch Doc: 15 July 2003 Editor's Draft
- Re: resources and URIs
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31] targets of sentences, was Re: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31] targets of sentences, was Re: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
Tuesday, 15 July 2003
- erratum Re: resources and URIs
- Re: resources and URIs
- resources and URIs
- Correction [Was: [Minutes] 14 Jul 2003 TAG teleconf (WS visibility, Extensibility, Arch Doc, Charmod conformance)
- Re: New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services
- Meaning of a Resource: Comment on 27th June 2003 webarch WD
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
- Re: More thoughts on 'Client handling of MIME headers'
- [Minutes] 14 Jul 2003 TAG teleconf (WS visibility, Extensibility, Arch Doc, Charmod conformance)
Monday, 14 July 2003
- Summary of TAG activity from 10 Jun to 9 Jul 2003
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- [metaDataInURI-31] targets of sentences, was Re: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: Unknown content types
- More thoughts on 'Client handling of MIME headers'
- Re: Unknown content types
- Re: Unknown content types
- Re: Unknown content types
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/c omment.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
Sunday, 13 July 2003
Friday, 11 July 2003
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/c omment.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/c omment.
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- RE: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt.
- Re: Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
Thursday, 10 July 2003
- Some comments on 27 June 2003 Web Arch WD
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/ comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt.
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- [Agenda] 14 July 2003 TAG teleconf (Findings, New issues, Arch Doc)
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
Wednesday, 9 July 2003
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- Re: Unknown content types
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- RE: Unknown content types
- Re: 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- 9 July 2003 draft of "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST" available
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt.
- unsubcribe christopher.houghland@ncmail.net
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
Tuesday, 8 July 2003
Wednesday, 9 July 2003
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
- 9 July 2003 draft of "Client handling of MIME headers" available
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/c omment.
- RE: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
Tuesday, 8 July 2003
- Re: Section 3.2.2.4 text on extensibilty
- Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comment.
- Notice about w3c mailing list archive problem
- [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt.
Monday, 7 July 2003
- [Minutes] 7 Jul 2003 TAG teleconf (contentTypeOverride-24 (and Voice spec), whenToUseGet-7, metadataInURI-31)
- RE: Section 3.2.2.4 text on extensibilty
- Re: Section 3.2.2.4 text on extensibilty
- Re: URIQA
- RE: TAG preparing to approve finding "Client handling of MIME hea ders"
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Review of contentTypeOverride-24
Sunday, 6 July 2003
Friday, 4 July 2003
Thursday, 3 July 2003
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- [Agenda] 7 Jul 2003 TAG teleconf (contentTypeOverride-24, Findings, errorHandling-20, RDFinXHTML-35, mixedUIXMLNamespace-33)
- New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: TAG preparing to approve finding "Client handling of MIME headers"
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
Wednesday, 2 July 2003
- Re: Invalid JAR URIs
- RE: xlinkScope-23 and XML Core WG [was: [Minutes] 30 June 2003 TA G teleconference]
- RE: xlinkScope-23 and XML Core WG [was: [Minutes] 30 June 2003 TA G teleconference]
- xlinkScope-23 and XML Core WG [was: [Minutes] 30 June 2003 TAG teleconference]
- Re: URIQA
- Invalid JAR URIs