- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 08:47:32 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> was heard to say:
[...]
| 2.2.1 contentTypeOverride-24
|
| * [16]Client handling of MIME headers; see [17]summary of comments.
| 1. Action SW 2003/06/23: Talk to Voice Browser WG about proposed
| text, then bring back to TAG.
| 2. Completed action IJ 2003/06/16: Add to draft finding
| discussion about servers not guessing header information
| (e.g., charset). Completed in 25 June draft of finding.
| 3. Completed aaction IJ 2003/06/23: Revise finding based on
| discussion of 23 June TAG teleconf. ([18]Done)
|
| [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
| [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0099.html
| [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0071.html
|
| [Ian]
| IJ: Next steps? Does anyone want to read before we say "We
| think we're done"?
| CL: Has the SMIL IG been contacted?
| IJ: No.
|
| [TBray]
| Scenario 2 in Section 2 has funny formatting; grey surround-box
| misshapen
|
| [Ian]
| Action CL, NW: Read this draft by next week.
The draft looks good to me. Perhaps I've forgotten part of our
discussion. Was the decision to say "SHOULD NOT" rather than "MUST
NOT" in list item #3 of Section 6 intentional?
Given the damage that misrepresentation can cause, I'd support "MUST
NOT".
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Who knows whether the best of men be known?
XML Standards Architect | or whether there be not more remarkable
Web Tech. and Standards | persons forgot, than any that stand
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | remembered in the known account of time.--Sir
| Thomas Browne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE/CWvkOyltUcwYWjsRAtIVAJ96UhL+EmDUmTCO4UpLnvUzK1nclQCfUr74
EVdFa0bH2q8z21LkpOigYw4=
=XiqL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 7 July 2003 08:48:19 UTC