- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:23:34 +0100
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Getting out of my depth, but... does this have any relationship to the work that Dana Scott did back in the 1970s on lattices and a theory of computation, which in turn provided some basis for denotational semantics of programming languages? I recall that the notions of approximation and monotonicity came into that work, with some reference to functions being ordered according to some notion of "accuracy". #g -- At 09:45 22/07/03 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: >You could research John Sowa's lattice theory for >more precise language to describe this notion. > >Apologies but Google returns far too much material >to provide a precise URI to start the research >if you aren't already acquainted with it. And >that tells us something about URIs and precise >identification. :-) > >len > >-----Original Message----- >From: Graham Klyne [mailto:gk@ninebynine.org] > >We agree that we, as people, try to use a URI to refer to >a "single", more or less consistent, concept that is a topic of >communication. But there is no way to formalize this single concept: I >think the best we can do is to describe it as a kind of "locus" of >denotations from interpretations that satisfy some formal statements we can >make about it. ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2003 11:33:55 UTC