- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:46:03 +0100
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- CC: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > > At 1:45 PM -0400 7/20/03, Jonathan Borden wrote: > >> If the WebArch document could better clarify which of the above usages of >> the term "representation" is intended that might be helpful, >> alternatively >> state that either or both are acceptable. > > > Option 3: Use different words for the different cases. Don't call both > of them representations of resources. > > Option 4: Recognize that a resource can both have a representation of > itself and be a reprsentation of another resource, and there's no > particular limit to this chain. e.g. a PDF document is a representation > of the master document which is a representation of the weather in > Oaxaca. Perhaps some things can be both resources and representations > simultaneously? Perhaps there's no limit to this? Perhaps's turtles all > the way down? :-) Another option: answer this question: are the resources and representations disjoint? Bill de hÓra
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 05:46:14 UTC