- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:14:30 -0700
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>, "'Michael Mealling'" <michael@neonym.net>, www-tag@w3.org
Sandro Hawke wrote: > My glimmer of hope in all this is "303 See Other" redirects. It seems > reasonable to say that if you get a 303 response during a dereference > attempt then the URI *does*not*denote*a*response*point*. This gives > us a coherent universe of response points and other things (like > chairs), without resorting to using hash marks. So you are going to conclude from one instance of a 303 that this will be the behavior for all time? Especially since RFC2616 says "The 303 response MUST NOT be cached." -Tim
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 17:14:31 UTC