- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 11 Jul 2003 15:34:01 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Thanks for the pointers; I'll have to study this some more. On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 13:54, David Orchard wrote: > [...] > > > > Perhaps a pointer to such a discussion would help me understand what > > you're after. > > > > SOAP 1.2 talks about soap resources "on the web" > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part2-20030624/#RPConWeb. > They make the assumption that HTTP POSTs are not "on the web". > > Some people have then interpreted "not on the web" as being bad. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2003Jun/0204.html. I then > provide a rough definition of "on the web". > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2003Jun/0207.html. > > Another discussion has ensued, such as the relationship between the > availability of the resource and "on the web". > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0082.html > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 16:34:06 UTC