- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:53:15 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> was heard to say: [...] | what it is that y'all are saying in these various documents. The words | "resource" , "representation of" and "on the information network" are | yours, not mine or the semantic web's. Right now, I don't think | anyone could make sense of what y'all seem to be saying, which is why | Im making a fuss about it. I don't see how these definitions can possibly help, but I think they're consistent and I think I believe them. resource = anything at all: real, imaginary, conceptual, fantastical, or mundane representation of = something which portrays a resource; most often in the arch doc a bag of bits with a MIME type and other metadata, though I'm not prepared to state that that's the only meaning it ever has without another careful reading. on the information network = has a URI Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Simplicity is always a virtue.--Edward Abbey XML Standards Architect | Web Tech. and Standards | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/JWMLOyltUcwYWjsRAjy5AJ9bHVGhfIGiqVhoFrd09sxjSfkOjQCfZ6F8 5XMntUul+6WSpXoKVIRitXg= =ZNQj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 14:21:32 UTC