- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:42:38 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
>On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 14:04, pat hayes wrote: >> >On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 13:13, pat hayes wrote: >> >[...] >> >> >No, it's just a wierd way to model it... you're saying that >> >> >a galaxy is something you can get at with the HTTP >> >> >protocol. >> >> >> >> Ah!! Good, at last. So (contrary to what you say above and the TAG >> >> architecture description together imply) >> > >> >No, there is no contradiction. Don't overgeneralize. >> > >> >Just because >> > http://chandra.harvard.edu/AOtype/Activegalaxy7 >> >should not be used to denote a galaxy does >> >not mean that *no* URI should be used to denote >> >a galxy. just use >> > http://chandra.harvard.edu/AOtype/Activegalaxy7#g1 >> >or some such. >> > >> > >> >I'm not inclined to read the rest of what you wrote until >> >you read more carefully what I wrote. >> >> What part of the TAG architecture document supports this very strong >> distinction (which I now grok) between URIs with and without a # >> symbol? > >None, yet. > >I thought I made it clear that httpRange-14 was an open >issue, not yet addressed in the webarch doc, >and I was sharing some observations from my own perspective >on the issue. Oh, sorry. I didnt realize that open meant not addressed at all. The draft is in an earlier state than I thought. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 23:42:40 UTC