- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 03 Jul 2003 16:38:48 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda of the 7 July 2003 TAG teleconference
is available as HTML and as text below.
TAG participants, please note the homework
assignments.
_ Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/07/07-tag.html
==============================================
Agenda for 7 July 2003 TAG teleconference
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
Homework
* All: [7]Text sent by David Orchard about extensibility.
* At least CL, NW: [8]Client handling of MIME headers
* All: Second comment from Noah in [9]summary of comments about
[10]URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST
* All: [11]Notes from Chris Lilley on error handling
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0086.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0099.html
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet-20030509.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jun/0099.html
1. Administrative (10min)
1. Roll call. No regrets sent.
2. Accept minutes of [12]30 Jun teleconference?
3. Accept this [13]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 14 July?
5. Face-to-face meeting agenda?
[12] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/30-tag-summary.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2003/07/07-tag.html
2. Technical (80 mins)
2.1 Review of text from Voice Browser Working Group (20 mins)
* [14]contentTypeOverride-24
+ [15]Speech Recognition Grammar Specification Version 1.0,
section [16]2.2.2 External Reference by URI
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[15] http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/
[16] http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/#S2.2.2
@@Awaiting text@@
2.2 Findings (20 mins)
See also: [17]findings.
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
Next steps on these findings:
* [18]contentTypeOverride-24: [19]Client handling of MIME headers;
see [20]summary of comments.
1. Action SW 2003/06/23: Talk to Voice Browser WG about proposed
text, then bring back to TAG.
2. Action CL, NW 2003/06/30: Read the draft finding by 7 July.
3. Completed action IJ 2003/06/30: Announce on www-tag that we
expect to approve this finding in a week or so. Last chance
for comments ([21]Done)
4. Completed action IJ 2003/06/30: Ping SMIL IG about this
finding, which refers to architectural error in SMIL 2.0
([22]Done).
5. See [23]comments from Philipp Hoschka
* [24]xmlIDSemantics-32:
1. [25]Chris Lilley draft finding.
2. Action CL 2003/06/30: Revise this draft finding with new
input from reviewers. 7 July Deadline.
* [26]URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST; see
[27]summary of comments. See also [28]comments from Larry
Masinter.
+ [29]whenToUseGet-7
o Next step for [30]revised draft finding?
o Action IJ 2003/06/23: Incorporate a sentence about scope
based on LM comments.
* [31]contentPresentation-26: Action CL 2003/06/02: Make available a
draft finding on content/presentation.
* [32]metadataInURI-31
+ Action SW 2003/06/02: Draft finding for this one. See [33]SW
proposal
+ See also [34]TB email on Apple Music Store and use of URI
schemes instead of headers
* Action IJ 2003/06/09: Turn [35]TB apple story into a finding.
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0099.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0002.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/symm/2003Jul/0004.html
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0005.html
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet-20030509.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0099.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0104.html
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#whenToUseGet-7
[30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7-20020610.html
[31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003May/0050.html
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0151.html
[35] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/04/30/AppleWA
2.3 Architecture document (15 minutes)
[36]27 June 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc published.
1. Discussion of [37]text sent by David Orchard about extensibility.
2. Action PC 2003/06/16: Send second draft of AC announcement
regarding TAG's last call expectations/thoughts and relation to AC
meeting feedback.
3. Action RF 2003/06/02: Rewrite section 5. Section 5 is expected to
be short.
4. Action IJ 2003/06/16: Attempt to incorporate relevant bits of
"[38]Conversations and State" into section to be produced by RF.
[36] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030627/
[37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0086.html
[38] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Conversations
2.4 Issues the TAG intends to discuss (25 mins)
* [39]errorHandling-20
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
has been signaled. Due first week of March.
* [40]RDFinXHTML-35
* [41]mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#RDFinXHTML-35
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
2.5 Issues with action items
* [42]uriMediaType-9
+ IANA appears to have responded to the spirit of this draft
(see [43]email from Chris Lilley).What's required to close
this issue?
+ Action CL 2003/05/05: Propose CL's three changes to
registration process to Ned Freed. [What forum?]
* [44]HTTPSubstrate-16
+ Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
to be excluded from RFC 3205
+ See [45]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
* [46]xlinkScope-23
+ See [47]draft, and [48]SW message to CG chairs.
+ Action CL 2003/06/30: Ping the chairs of those groups asking
for an update on xlinkScope-23.
* [49]binaryXML-30
+ Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
adding to survey.
+ Next steps to finding? See [50]summary from Chris.
* [51]xmlFunctions-34
+ Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
XML Core work. See [52]email from TimBL capturing some of the
issues.
* [53]siteData-36
+ Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0302.html
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
[45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
[47] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
[48] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
[50] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
[51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
[52] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
[53] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
2.6 Issues the TAG intends to discuss at face-to-face meeting
Identifiers
* [54]URIEquivalence-15
+ SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where [55]Tim Bray text has
been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this
issue to pending state.
* [56]IRIEverywhere-27
+ Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of
IRIs. CL says to expect this by 21 April.
+ Action TBL 2003/04/28: Explain how existing specifications
that handle IRIs are inconsistent. [57]TBL draft not yet
available on www-tag.
+ See TB's[58]proposed step forward on IRI 27.
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
[55] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4
[56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
[57] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0074.html
[58] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
Qnames, fragments, and media types
* [59]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum ([60]RQ-23).
* [61]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
1. Connection to content negotiation?
2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
3. No actions associated / no owner.
* [62]abstractComponentRefs-37
+ See [63]issue description from David Orchard. Next steps?
+ Action DO 2003/06/23: Point Jonathan Marsh at options. Ask
them for their analysis.
* [64]putMediaType-38
[59] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[60] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
[61] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
[62] http://www.w3.org/2003/07/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[63] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0089.html
[64] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#putMediaType-38
RDDL, namespace documents
* [65]namespaceDocument-8
+ Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status
section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable
format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up
messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a
canonical mapping to RDF. See TB's [66]1 June version.
+ Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue,
pointing to the RDDL Note. See [67]comments from Paul
regarding TB theses.
+ Refer to draft TAG [68]opinion from Tim Brayon the use of
URNs for namespace names.
o RF: Folks assume that because the specs say so, URNs
will be persisitent. But persistence is a function of
institutional commitment and frequency of use.
[65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
[66] http://www.tbray.org/tag/rddl/rddl3.html
[67] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0046.html
[68] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0003.html
2.7 New issues?
The TAG expects to discuss these on 14 July.
1. [69]Visibility of Web Services, raised by Mark Baker
2. [70]Character model conformance, raised by TBL
3. [71]Meaning of URIs in RDF documents, raised by TBL
[69] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0069.html
[70] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0009.html
[71] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0022.html
3. Other actions
* Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making
substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in
May.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/07/03 14:46:58 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 16:38:58 UTC