- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 07:47:23 -0400
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org, Bill.de.h"ra <dehora@eircom.net>"@dr-nick.w3.org
At 12:50 AM +0200 7/4/03, Chris Lilley wrote: >I agree http would do as well since that is actualy the protocol used. >jar: would fall into the itunes trap. I don't think it's guaranteed that http is the protocol used, though. They can equally well use file, ftp, or other protocols. Certainly it's not uncommon to load a jar from the file system. However, I don't see anything that would prevent a fragment identifier syntax from working with URLs for these other protocols as well. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
Received on Friday, 4 July 2003 08:08:01 UTC