- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:37:35 +0300
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>, "ext Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
----- Original Message ----- From: "ext Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> To: <www-tag@w3.org> Sent: 10 July, 2003 22:12 Subject: Re: [metaDataInURI-31]: Initial draft finding for public review/comme nt. > Handed a random URI about which you know nothing, my position is that > it is opaque and you've got no business peeking inside it trying to > guess stuff. Precisely. And if you want to know more about the resource denoted, you can (eventually, ideally) use GET <someURI> HTTP/1.1 URI-Resolution-Mode: Description to obtain a concise and authoritative description of the resource, and one that can be modified freely and frequently without any impact to the lexical persistence and hence functional longevity of the URI denoting the resource in question. And no unnecessary constraints are placed on the creation of URIs in order to meet the needs of knowledge discovery. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 06:37:45 UTC