- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 10 Jul 2003 10:59:44 -0700
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda of the 14 July 2003 TAG teleconf is available
as HTML [1] and as text below.
- Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/07/14-tag.html
--------------------------------------------------------
Agenda for 14 July 2003 TAG teleconference
Homework
1. 8 July 2003 draft of "[7]The use of Metadata in URIs"
2. 9 July 2003 draft of [8]Client handling of MIME headers
3. [9]Text sent by David Orchard about extensibility
4. [10]Threads on visibility of Web Services issue
[7] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/metaDataInURI-31
[8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0086.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jun/0055.html
1. Administrative (15min)
1. Roll call. Likely regrets: NW.
2. Accept corrected minutes of [11]30 Jun teleconference?
3. Accept minutes of [12]7 Jul teleconference?
4. Accept this [13]agenda?
5. Accept [14]draft summary of TAG activity
6. Next meeting: 21-23 July ftf meeting
7. Face-to-face meeting [15]draft agenda.
[11] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/30-tag-summary.html
[12] http://www.w3.org/2003/07/07-tag-summary.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2003/07/14-tag.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0036.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0042.html
2. Technical (75 mins)
2.1 Findings (25 mins)
See also: [16]findings.
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
Next steps on these findings:
* [17]contentTypeOverride-24: 9 July 2003 draft of [18]Client
handling of MIME headers
1. Action CL, NW 2003/06/30: Read the draft finding by 7 July.
[19]NW Done
2. Completed action IJ 2003/07/07: Produce a new draft of the
finding on MIME headers that takes into account comments from
Rob Lanphier, TBL, NW, SW (editorial), and above resolution.
3. Completed action IJ 2003/07/07: Follow up with SYMM IG saying
we'll take into account input and produce new draft of this
finding.
* 9 July 2003 draft of [20]URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP
GET and POST
+ [21]whenToUseGet-7
o Completed action IJ 2003/06/23: Incorporate a sentence
about scope based on LM comments.
o Completed action IJ 2003/07/07: Produce new draft of
finding with (1) change based on LM comment, (2) text
from DO/NM (3) don't address PUT in this finding, but
add comment about new issue [22]putMediaType-38 (second
point in [23]summary of comments).
o Subsumed action DO 2003/07/07: Send text that DO and
Noah M. can agree to to tag@w3.org. (DO should verify 9
July text)
* [24]metadataInURI-31: 8 July 2003 draft of "[25]The use of
Metadata in URIs"
+ Completed action SW 2003/07/07: Create new draft based on
input today and send to www-tag.
+ Action DO 2003/07/07: Send rationale about why WSDL WG wants
to peek inside the URI.
+ See also [26]TB email on Apple Music Store and use of URI
schemes instead of headers
* [27]xmlIDSemantics-32:
1. [28]Chris Lilley draft finding.
2. Action CL 2003/06/30: Revise this draft finding with new
input from reviewers. 7 July Deadline.
* [29]contentPresentation-26: Action CL 2003/06/02: Make available a
draft finding on content/presentation.
* Action IJ 2003/06/09: Turn [30]TB apple story into a finding.
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect.html
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0028.html
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet-20030709.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#whenToUseGet-7
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#putMediaType-38
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0099.html
[24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/metaDataInURI-31
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0151.html
[27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
[28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[30] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/04/30/AppleWA
2.2 New issues? (30 mins)
1. [31]Visibility of Web Services, raised by Mark Baker
2. [32]Character model conformance, raised by TBL
3. [33]Meaning of URIs in RDF documents, raised by TBL
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003May/0069.html
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0009.html
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0022.html
2.3 Architecture document (20 mins)
[34]27 June 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc published.
1. Discussion of [35]text sent by David Orchard about extensibility.
2. Action RF 2003/06/02: Rewrite section 5. Section 5 is expected to
be short.
3. Action IJ 2003/06/16: Attempt to incorporate relevant bits of
"[36]Conversations and State" into section to be produced by RF.
4. Action SW 2003/07/07: Try to get TimBL to sign off on Paul's text.
If SW able to reach TBL, SW/TBL send to AC as co-chairs. If not,
have IJ send on behalf of TAG.
[34] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030627/
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0086.html
[36] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Conversations
2.4 Issues with action items
The TAG does not expect to discuss these.
* [37]uriMediaType-9
+ IANA appears to have responded to the spirit of this draft
(see [38]email from Chris Lilley).What's required to close
this issue?
+ Action CL 2003/05/05: Propose CL's three changes to
registration process to Ned Freed. [What forum?]
* [39]HTTPSubstrate-16
+ Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
to be excluded from RFC 3205
+ See [40]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
* [41]xlinkScope-23
+ See [42]draft, and [43]SW message to CG chairs.
+ Action CL 2003/06/30: Ping the chairs of those groups asking
for an update on xlinkScope-23.
* [44]binaryXML-30
+ Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
adding to survey.
+ Next steps to finding? See [45]summary from Chris.
* [46]xmlFunctions-34
+ Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
XML Core work. See [47]email from TimBL capturing some of the
issues.
* [48]siteData-36
+ Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
[38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0302.html
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
[40] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
[42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
[45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
[47] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
2.5 Issues the TAG intends to discuss at face-to-face meeting
Identifiers
* [49]URIEquivalence-15
+ SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where [50]Tim Bray text has
been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this
issue to pending state.
* [51]IRIEverywhere-27
+ Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of
IRIs.
+ Action TBL 2003/04/28: Explain how existing specifications
that handle IRIs are inconsistent. [52]TBL draft not yet
available on www-tag.
+ See TB's[53]proposed step forward on IRI 27.
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
[50] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4
[51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
[52] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0074.html
[53] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
Qnames, fragments, and media types
* [54]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum ([55]RQ-23).
* [56]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
1. Connection to content negotiation?
2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
3. No actions associated / no owner.
* [57]abstractComponentRefs-37
+ See [58]issue description from David Orchard. Next steps?
+ Action DO 2003/06/23: Point Jonathan Marsh at options. Ask
them for their analysis.
* [59]putMediaType-38
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[55] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
[56] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
[57] http://www.w3.org/2003/07/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[58] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0089.html
[59] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#putMediaType-38
RDDL, namespace documents
* [60]namespaceDocument-8
+ Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status
section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable
format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up
messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a
canonical mapping to RDF. See TB's [61]1 June version.
+ Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue,
pointing to the RDDL Note. See [62]comments from Paul
regarding TB theses.
+ Refer to draft TAG [63]opinion from Tim Brayon the use of
URNs for namespace names.
o RF: Folks assume that because the specs say so, URNs
will be persisitent. But persistence is a function of
institutional commitment and frequency of use.
[60] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
[61] http://www.tbray.org/tag/rddl/rddl3.html
[62] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0046.html
[63] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jun/0003.html
Other actions
* [64]RDFinXHTML-35
* [65]mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
* [66]errorHandling-20
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
has been signaled. Due first week of March.
[64] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#RDFinXHTML-35
[65] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
[66] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
3. Other actions
* Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making
substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in
May.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/07/10 17:57:40 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2003 14:00:00 UTC