- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:52:01 -0700
- To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
my $.02 is that even with almost unlimited clarifications and stories, in super short or super long and detailed form, the TAG won't take this up as an issue. But hey, if people want to continue to talk about something that the TAG has now at least once declined to take up, so beit. > > At this point, I'm not really sure where this discussion is going, so > I'll avoid responding until it's clear where the TAG wants to > take this > (which could be to the dumper 8-). I wanted to give Dan his "story", > and did that, but based on the feedback from Roy and Miles, perhaps I > need a new one that better illustrates my objection with the text that > says; > > "A fire- wall can look at the message traffic, and at the > structure of > the message, and make predictable and reasonable decisions about > security." > Cheers, Dave
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 01:07:57 UTC