W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2003

Re: resources and URIs

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 23 Jul 2003 17:17:12 -0700
To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1059005832.1656.1164.camel@jammer.dm93.org>

On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 14:04, pat hayes wrote:
> >On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 13:13, pat hayes wrote:
> >[...]
> >>  >No, it's just a wierd way to model it... you're saying that
> >>  >a galaxy is something you can get at with the HTTP
> >>  >protocol.
> >>
> >>  Ah!!  Good, at last. So (contrary to what you say above and the TAG
> >>  architecture description together imply)
> >
> >No, there is no contradiction. Don't overgeneralize.
> >
> >Just because
> >   http://chandra.harvard.edu/AOtype/Activegalaxy7
> >should not be used to denote a galaxy does
> >not mean that *no* URI should be used to denote
> >a galxy. just use
> >   http://chandra.harvard.edu/AOtype/Activegalaxy7#g1
> >or some such.
> >
> >
> >I'm not inclined to read the rest of what you wrote until
> >you read more carefully what I wrote.
> 
> What part of the TAG architecture document supports this very strong 
> distinction (which I now grok) between URIs with and without a # 
> symbol?

None, yet.

I thought I made it clear that httpRange-14 was an open
issue, not yet addressed in the webarch doc,
and I was sharing some observations from my own perspective
on the issue.

> 
> Pat

-- 
Dan
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 20:17:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:00 UTC