- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 23 Jul 2003 17:17:12 -0700
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 14:04, pat hayes wrote: > >On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 13:13, pat hayes wrote: > >[...] > >> >No, it's just a wierd way to model it... you're saying that > >> >a galaxy is something you can get at with the HTTP > >> >protocol. > >> > >> Ah!! Good, at last. So (contrary to what you say above and the TAG > >> architecture description together imply) > > > >No, there is no contradiction. Don't overgeneralize. > > > >Just because > > http://chandra.harvard.edu/AOtype/Activegalaxy7 > >should not be used to denote a galaxy does > >not mean that *no* URI should be used to denote > >a galxy. just use > > http://chandra.harvard.edu/AOtype/Activegalaxy7#g1 > >or some such. > > > > > >I'm not inclined to read the rest of what you wrote until > >you read more carefully what I wrote. > > What part of the TAG architecture document supports this very strong > distinction (which I now grok) between URIs with and without a # > symbol? None, yet. I thought I made it clear that httpRange-14 was an open issue, not yet addressed in the webarch doc, and I was sharing some observations from my own perspective on the issue. > > Pat -- Dan
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 20:17:14 UTC