- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:46:04 -0500
- To: "'Norman Walsh'" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, www-tag@w3.org
The utility of the name depends on the facility of node on the network to dereference it. A URI is a name until it is actively dereferenced. A network that includes all things that can be named in the universe but does not provide a means to choose among all equally probable candidates is fully entropic (worthless). To reduce the entropy, one has to bound the definition to include only system components that can reliably respond to some acceptable degree of certainty. A person observing the bus can reasonably expect to copy the name on the bus into their web-capable and receive a response of some kind. As a member of the universe that can contain a URI, if we claim the bus is on the web, we have said the web, as a system, is randomly reliable. If resource must be identified by a URI, and a resource returns representations, then: 1. Neither the bus nor the galaxy are on the web. They cannot return a representation. The URI on them is just a syntactically valid name given it can be tested and proven so. 2. Because they aren't, the hash mark changes nothing. 3. The range of the hashed information is delimited by the resource. If the resource cannot return a representation, that range is the empty set. 4. The return of a representation is testable. Until that test returns a value, the set is empty. Provable existence 'on the web' is a transient condition of resources AND representations. That the range of a hashed identity is transient follows for any resource or representation. The resource must determine the range for any URI that it handles and return a representation if it has one. In the web-as-a-network architecture, is there any request operation for which the system does not return an ack? len From: Norman Walsh [mailto:Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM] | / "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com> was heard to say: | | Nicely vague but operationally meaningless and that is | | what a lot of people are having problems with. Saying | | a resource is the side of the bus that the URI is printed | | on plus anything else printed there, or that a Ford Galaxy | | or a Ford Falcon are resources 'on the web' makes the | | web equal to the knowable universe. | | | | That buys us exactly nothing at the cost of Boltzman entropy. All you seem to be saying is that if I put a #-mark in all those URIs on the sides of busses, everything would be ok. Is that so?
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 17:46:13 UTC