- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:36:56 +0300
- To: "ext Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, <www-tag@w3.org>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
----- Original Message ----- From: "ext Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org> To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> Cc: "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>; "pat hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>; <www-tag@w3.org>; "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> Sent: 17 July, 2003 19:45 Subject: Re: resources and URIs > > > > [folks with other opinions on httpRange-14 disagree, > > > I believe.] > > > > Let us hope they end up a majority. > > I think both ideas can co-exist effectively. We can work on "Best > Practices" advice, without outlawing anything. I don't see how the use of URIrefs with fragIds could be promoted as a "best practice" given all the problems it raises. Also, such a "best practice" would be in direct conflict with another "best practice", namely: don't peek inside URIs. Hopefully, the TAG will not be recommending conflicting best practices... > Some of us have been trying to gather consensus discussions of the > issues on the ESW wiki [1]. It's a medium with less tendency towards > repeated arguments. Feel free to read and contribute. > > -- sandro > > [1] You might start at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HashVsSlash Thanks. Patrick
Received on Friday, 18 July 2003 05:37:17 UTC