Thursday, 30 June 2005
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: Layout is content, not a property of content.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- [CSS3 Text] 2 Editorial Notes + Hyphenation Files
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?)
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Layout is content, not a property of content.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- FAQ about reasons behind CSS
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
Tuesday, 28 June 2005
Wednesday, 29 June 2005
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.u
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- We are where we are.... but how did we get here?
- Re: [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051
- [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- RE: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
Tuesday, 28 June 2005
Wednesday, 29 June 2005
Tuesday, 28 June 2005
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Absolute-relative positioning
- RE: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- [CSS21] Typo: "Features at risk"
Monday, 27 June 2005
Tuesday, 28 June 2005
Monday, 27 June 2005
- Behavioral Extensions to CSS
- CSS3 Text Effects Module Typo
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
Sunday, 26 June 2005
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Interoperability requirements (Was: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id)
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
Saturday, 25 June 2005
Friday, 24 June 2005
- Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id
- Re: Invisible Text
- CSS3 column length
- Re: Invisible Text
- Re: Invisible Text
- Re: Invisible Text
- Re: Invisible Text
- Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
Thursday, 23 June 2005
- Re: Invisible Text
- Invisible Text
- Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
- Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
- Re: Toggling a CSS property
- Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
- Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
- Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
- Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
- Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted?
Wednesday, 22 June 2005
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- RE: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- RE: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- RE: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
Tuesday, 21 June 2005
Monday, 20 June 2005
Sunday, 19 June 2005
Saturday, 18 June 2005
- RE: Proposal: display-order for serialization display order
- [CSS2.1] Malformed markup in section 9.3.1
- Re: [CSS2.1][CSS3 Lists] List-style-type values
- [CSS2.1] Missleading example in 3.1 Conformanse: Definitions: Ignore
Friday, 17 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- [CSS3UI] x/y cursor hotspot values
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: [CSS2.1] Counters
- Re: [CSS2.1] Comments
- [CSS2.1] typo in outline-width
- Re: New Selectors
- New Selectors
- Re: New Selectors
- New Selectors
- Re: Proposal: display-order for serialization display order
- Proposal: display-order for serialization display order
- Réf. : Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
Thursday, 16 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- [CSS21] error in counters example
- Re: Arabic letters separated by markup
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: [CSS2.1] Comments
- Re: [CSS2.1] Counters
- Re: [CSS2.1] Counters nesting
- Re: [CSS2.1] Counters
- Re: [CSS2.1] Comments
- Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.
- Re: [CSS2.1] Counters nesting
- Re: [CSS2.1] Counters nesting
Wednesday, 15 June 2005
Thursday, 16 June 2005
Wednesday, 15 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: [CSS2.1] Comments
- Re: [CSS2.1] Interaction (or lack of such) of lists and counters
- [CSS2.1] Comments
- Re: [CSS2.1] Counters
- [CSS2.1] Counters
- [CSS2.1] Replaced elements
- [CSS2.1] Interaction (or lack of such) of lists and counters
- [CSS2.1] Attribute selectors
- [CSS2.1][CSS3 Lists] List-style-type values
- Re: Proposal: %% units
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- [CSS21] duplicated paragraph in the class selector description
Tuesday, 14 June 2005
Wednesday, 15 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: %% units
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- [CSS2.1] CSS Class Selector
- Re: Proposal: %% units
Tuesday, 14 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: %% units (was: content-vertical-alignment)
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: %% units (was: content-vertical-alignment)
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- [CSS21] User Selectively Disabling Properties should be allowed
- Incremental rendering in CSS (Was: DTP with XHTML+CSS)
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- [CSS21] Last Call: CSS 2.1 Specification
- RE: [css3] Specification Print Rules
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Multi-column layout (was Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS)
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- Re: [css3] Specification Print Rules
Monday, 13 June 2005
- Re: Arabic letters separated by markup
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- [css3] Specification Print Rules
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS
- DTP with XHTML+CSS
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
Sunday, 12 June 2005
Monday, 13 June 2005
Sunday, 12 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
Saturday, 11 June 2005
Friday, 10 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment - rewording
Thursday, 9 June 2005
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment - rewording
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
- Proposal: content-vertical-alignment
Wednesday, 8 June 2005
- Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after
- Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after
- Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after
Tuesday, 7 June 2005
- Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after
- [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after
- Importance of Selectors (was: Re: content-vertical-align and What is CSS aiming?)
- Re: RE Bounding box
Monday, 6 June 2005
- content-vertical-align and What is CSS aiming? (was Re: Vertical Alignment)
- Re: RE Bounding box
- Re: Vertical Alignment
- Re: Vertical Alignment
- RE Bounding box
- Vertical Alignment
Thursday, 2 June 2005
Wednesday, 1 June 2005
- FW: Re: Suggestion: Inheritance
- Re: Correct alignment inheritance behavior for dir="rtl"
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Re: Initial Value
- Initial Value