- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:15:38 -0700
- To: "Matthew Raymond" <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Cc: "J. King" <mtknight@dark-phantasy.com>, "www-style" <www-style@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Raymond" <mattraymond@earthlink.net> To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news@terrainformatica.com> Cc: "J. King" <mtknight@dark-phantasy.com>; "www-style" <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id | Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > From: "J. King" <mtknight@dark-phantasy.com> | > To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news@terrainformatica.com> | > Cc: "www-style" <www-style@w3.org> | > Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 9:06 PM | > Subject: Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id | > | > | > | On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:59:41 -0400, Andrew Fedoniouk | > | <news@terrainformatica.com> wrote: | > | | > | > Too many features there are HTML specific or with | > | > HTML only in mind. | > | | > | Like what? | > | | > | > "CSS2.1 aims to reflect what CSS features are reasonably widely implemented | > for HTML and XML languages in general (rather than only for a particular XML | > language, or only for HTML)." | > (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/about.html) | > | > At least this statement tells us that CSS is designed only for HTML and some | > XML languages. | | Is this a joke, because it seems to say the opposite to me. At best | you could say that this statement indicates CSS favors an HTML-style | language. | | > And this peculiar statement: | > "A user agent that supports XHTML [XHTML], but not HTML (as listed in the | > previous sentence) is not considered an HTML user agent for the purpose of | > conformance with this specification." | > ( http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html ) | | I don't see the issue here. HTML != XHTML. Therefore, why would you | call an XHTML-only user agent an "HTML user agent"? | In any case this phrase (A user agent that....) has also grammatical problems as far as I can see. I am not sure about my English but I think it should be written as: "A user agent that supports XHTML [XHTML], but not HTML (as listed in the previous sentence) [,] is not considered [as] an HTML user agent for the purpose of conformance with this specification." Correct me if I am wrong. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2005 06:15:47 UTC