- From: Emrah BASKAYA <emrahbaskaya@hesido.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:34:11 +0300
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:47:00 +0300, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > > Emrah BASKAYA wrote: >> Proposal: A new property that will allow any content in a given element >> to >> be centered vertically: >> content-vertical-align > > Just incase you, and anyone else, are unaware of this fact, vertical > centering is already possible using at least 2 different methods that I > know of (ignoring browser support issues). > > The following examples work with this minimal HTML document, and center > the p element both horizontally and vertically: > <html> > <title>Vertical Center</title> > <body> > <p>test > > Example 1: .... Thanks for pointing this out. It takes at least two wrapping elements (one table, and one table-cell) and its content wrapping element, but still, it would be the only way to go if content-vertical-align is not accepted, it is good to know there is a way (so there is a way.) (Tho not properly supported by that one browser, this isn't css's fault.) Which is another reason to why we need a content vertical-align: We can get rid of the extra syntax (and make use of percentages) needed to do the job, make it easier on the eye, avoid mixing-up of already misundertood vertical-align property (which should be named inline-vertical-align btw) I still think this proposal brings something nice to CSS, whose motto is seperation of style from content, so I am backing it like before. -- Emrah BASKAYA www.hesido.com
Received on Friday, 10 June 2005 13:34:25 UTC