- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:06:01 +0200
- To: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Orion Adrian schreef: >>And I'm not really sure whether it is worthwhile to sacrifice proper >>incremental rendering in favour of being able to specify such grids. > > This problem can be fixed without breaking incremental rendering in > most cases, but it requires come changes in how we think about > layouts. It also still has a lot of the problems (e.g. complex > interactions) that need to be solved. What I mean is, the number of designs where using e.g. a grid layout which breaks incremental rendering is limited (after all, look at all the current CSS-based web pages, and those aren’t even using display:table and absolute positioning), and other methods should be tried first :). <separator /> By the way, I wonder how the grid layout is insufficient. Your approach seemed to be just reordering of the document structure (or I must look better). The grid layout works based on a layout you want to achieve. It is indeed a different perspective, but it can do the same, and I think the grid one is more appropriate to CSS? ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2005 11:06:56 UTC