www-style@w3.org from June 2005 by author

Adam Kuehn

• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Allan Sandfeld Jensen

• Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1][CSS3 Lists] List-style-type values (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: New Selectors (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Counters nesting (Thursday, 16 June)
• [CSS2.1] Counters nesting (Thursday, 16 June)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Proposal: %% units (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Proposal: %% units (was: content-vertical-alignment) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Vertical Alignment (Monday, 6 June)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Wednesday, 29 June)

Asmus Freytag

• Re: Arabic letters separated by markup (Monday, 20 June)

Ben Curtis

• Re: Proposal: %% units (was: content-vertical-alignment) (Tuesday, 14 June)

Ben Ward

• [CSS21] Typo: "Features at risk" (Tuesday, 28 June)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• [CSS21] Last Call: CSS 2.1 Specification (Tuesday, 14 June)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after (Wednesday, 8 June)
• [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Brian Sexton

• Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Thursday, 23 June)
• Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Thursday, 23 June)

Chris Lilley

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Wednesday, 29 June)

Christian Biesinger

• [CSS3UI] x/y cursor hotspot values (Friday, 17 June)
• [CSS21] duplicated paragraph in the class selector description (Wednesday, 15 June)

Christoph Päper

• [CSS3 Text] 2 Editorial Notes + Hyphenation Files (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [css3] Specification Print Rules (Tuesday, 14 June)

Daniel Elleson

• RE Bounding box (Monday, 6 June)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)

Dave Hyatt

• Re: Invisible Text (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Thursday, 23 June)

David Pratten

• DTP with XHTML+CSS (Monday, 13 June)
• Desktop Publishing with XHTML+CSS (Sunday, 12 June)

David Woolley

• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Layout is content, not a property of content. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items.u (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Proposal: display-order for serialization display order (Sunday, 19 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: Incremental rendering in CSS (Was: DTP with XHTML+CSS) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Tuesday, 14 June)
• [CSS21] User Selectively Disabling Properties should be allowed (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Sunday, 12 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Sunday, 12 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment - rewording (Friday, 10 June)
• Importance of Selectors (was: Re: content-vertical-align and What is CSS aiming?) (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Re: RE Bounding box (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: Vertical Alignment (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: FW: Re: Suggestion: Inheritance (Thursday, 2 June)

Emrah BASKAYA

• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Absolute-relative positioning (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: Proposal: display-order for serialization display order (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Sunday, 12 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment - rewording (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)
• Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)
• content-vertical-align and What is CSS aiming? (was Re: Vertical Alignment) (Monday, 6 June)

Ernest Cline

• RE: Proposal: display-order for serialization display order (Saturday, 18 June)

fantasai

• [CSS3 Text] New W3C Working Draft Released (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: CSS3 Text Effects Module Typo (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: Arabic letters separated by markup (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Arabic letters separated by markup (Saturday, 11 June)

Felix Miata

• CSS3 column length (Friday, 24 June)
• css3 column length (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

George Chavchanidze

• [CSS2.1] Interaction (or lack of such) of lists and counters (Wednesday, 15 June)
• [CSS2.1] Attribute selectors (Wednesday, 15 June)
• [CSS2.1][CSS3 Lists] List-style-type values (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Tuesday, 14 June)

Grant, Melinda

• RE: [css3] Specification Print Rules (Tuesday, 14 June)

Hans Meiser

• Re: Suggestion: Inheritance (Thursday, 2 June)
• FW: Re: Suggestion: Inheritance (Wednesday, 1 June)

Ian Hickson

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: Behavioral Extensions to CSS (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Interoperability requirements (Was: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id) (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Saturday, 25 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Replaced elements and :before/:after (Tuesday, 7 June)

J. King

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [CSS2.1] Malformed markup in section 9.3.1 (Saturday, 18 June)

Jan Brasna

• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)

Jens Meiert

• [css3] Specification Print Rules (Monday, 13 June)

Justin Wood (Callek)

• [CSS2.1] CSS Class Selector (Wednesday, 15 June)

Kelly Miller

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: RE Bounding box (Tuesday, 7 June)

Kris@meridian-ds.com

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• RE: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 17 June)
• New Selectors (Friday, 17 June)
• New Selectors (Friday, 17 June)

L. David Baron

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [CSS21] error in counters example (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Comments (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Counters (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Counters nesting (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Counters nesting (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Comments (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Interaction (or lack of such) of lists and counters (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Counters (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)

Larry Israel

• Re: Toggling a CSS property (Thursday, 23 June)

Laurens Holst

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Proposal: %% units (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Proposal: %% units (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Incremental rendering in CSS (Was: DTP with XHTML+CSS) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Lauri Raittila

• [CSS2.1] Missleading example in 3.1 Conformanse: Definitions: Ignore (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 16 June)

leslie.brown@evidian.com

• Réf. : Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)

Maniac

• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Manuel Strehl

• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 17 June)
• Vertical Alignment (Monday, 6 June)

Martijn

• Re: Invisible Text (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: Invisible Text (Thursday, 23 June)

Masayasu Ishikawa

• Re: [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051 (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [CSS3 Text] Reference to JIS X 4051 (Wednesday, 29 June)

Mats Palmgren

• [CSS2.1] typo in outline-width (Friday, 17 June)

Matthew Raymond

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: Invisible Text (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: Invisible Text (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: Invisible Text (Friday, 24 June)
• Invisible Text (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Is Safari right or wrong? Should "display: none" prevent form elements from being submitted? (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Mikko Rantalainen

• Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Norman Walsh

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Tuesday, 28 June)
• [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Friday, 24 June)

Orion Adrian

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Thursday, 30 June)
• CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Layout is content, not a property of content. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Wednesday, 15 June)

Paul Duncan

• We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• RE: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• RE: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Tuesday, 28 June)
• RE: Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)

Philip TAYLOR

• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Thursday, 9 June)

ray whitfield

• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Fwd: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 15 June)

Robin Berjon

• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id (Tuesday, 28 June)

Rudolf Vavruch

• Multi-column layout (was Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Monday, 13 June)

Ryan Cannon

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Image-dislay status media query for reducing reflows -was Re: FAQ about reasons behind CSS (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [CSS21] properties for table-column (In HTML: COL) & table-column-group (In HTML: COLGROUP) items. (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Proposal: content-vertical-alignment (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: Initial Value (Wednesday, 1 June)

Sander

• Re: New Selectors (Friday, 17 June)

Sander van Dragt

• Proposal: display-order for serialization display order (Friday, 17 June)

Sebastian Redl

• CSS3 Text Effects Module Typo (Monday, 27 June)

Slava Sedov

• Behavioral Extensions to CSS (Monday, 27 June)

Staffan Måhlén

• Re: [CSS2.1] Counters (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Comments (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Counters (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [CSS2.1] Comments (Thursday, 16 June)
• [CSS2.1] Comments (Wednesday, 15 June)
• [CSS2.1] Counters (Wednesday, 15 June)
• [CSS2.1] Replaced elements (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Correct alignment inheritance behavior for dir="rtl" (Wednesday, 1 June)

Stephen R Laniel

• Toggling a CSS property (Tuesday, 21 June)

Steve Zilles

• Re: Arabic letters separated by markup (Thursday, 16 June)

Steven C. Perkins

• Re: DTP with XHTML+CSS (Tuesday, 14 June)

Tonico Strasser

• Re: CSS is doomed (10 years per version ?!?) (Thursday, 30 June)

Wingnut

• Re: We are where we are.... but how did we get here? (Wednesday, 29 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2005 21:53:25 UTC