Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Matthew Raymond" <>
To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <>
Cc: "www-style" <>
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id

| Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
| > "A user agent that supports XHTML [XHTML], but not HTML (as listed in 
| >  previous sentence) [,] is not considered [as] an HTML user agent for 
| > purpose of conformance with this specification."
| >
| > Correct me if I am wrong.
|    I agree with the comma, but not the "as".


I understand this statement as:

1) Only pure HTML UA is considered for purpose of conformance with this 
2) Pure XHTML/CSS UA cannot be considered as "interoperable implementation".

Does it mean that CSS contain constructions which can be demonstarted
only in HTML and not in XHTML?

Andrew Fedoniouk.

Received on Sunday, 26 June 2005 17:04:33 UTC