Re: [CSS21] Please endorse xml:id

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:22:51 -0400, Andrew Fedoniouk  
<> wrote:

> CSS also asumes that this DOM represents "endless tape" coming
> incrementally.
> Consequence: famous vertical alignment.

I hadn't considered that one.

> CSS asumes that this DOM is always placed in some view having known
> dimensions and capable to set flags :hover
> :active :focus :link , etc. to its elements.

Can you demonstrate a case where one would want to (or, for that matter  
could) render content onto a canvas of -unknown- dimensions?

Interactive pseudo-classes aren't limited to HTML or XML, especially since  
they aren't even reflective of the document tree.  I suppose :link -was-  
specified with HTML in mind, but UAs for document types that don't have  
links can still be interoperable in every other respect---and  
interoperable with each other in every way.

I think you're just splitting hairs here, Andrew.  The conformance  
requirements do state that lack of a feature in a UA due to technical  
limitations of a platform does not make it non-conformant.  Granted, they  
don't say anything about limitations of the document type, but that seems  
the implication.  Perhaps they should state this explicitly, though?

J. King

Received on Sunday, 26 June 2005 13:40:47 UTC