Re: [CSS2.1] Counters

On 16 Jun 2005 at 8:39, L. David Baron wrote:
> > The second problem could perhaps be addressed in the
> > definition of the counters function, by making it not include the
> > "initital" reset.
> Although that rule would require an exception for when the root reset is
> the only one in scope.  It's simpler to avoid exceptions on exceptions.

Yes, but i was thinking that wasn't going to be needed. Using
'counters' without resetting seems less likely while 'counter' 
could perhaps use the "error recovery".


Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 16:31:13 UTC