- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:39:16 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20050616153916.GA13528@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Thursday 2005-06-16 09:38 +0200, Staffan Måhlén wrote: > On 15 Jun 2005 at 9:42, L. David Baron wrote: > > > to something like: > > > " > > > The scope of all counters used in a document are reset to 0 at the > > > root element unless explicitly set to a different value. Each element > > > that has 'counter-reset' for a counter creates a new scope that > > > includes its descendants. > > > " > > > > This would not only break Hn numbering, but would also cause lists > > numbered using counters() to all have an additional "0." at the > > beginning of the number, e.g. "0.10.3" instead of "10.3". > > > > Ok that makes sense i suppose. Just to make sure i get it, you want > to allow headings to be scope-generating without being nested in the > document, rather than use the list-method where a common ancestor > is needed? > h1 {counter-reset: h2 0 h3 0 h4 0...} > h2 {counter-reset: h3 0 h4 0...} Yes. I've actually used the following to number headings: html { counter-reset: h2 h3 h4 h5 h6; } h2:not(.no-num) { counter-reset: h3 h4 h5 h6; counter-increment: h2; } h3:not(.no-num) { counter-reset: h4 h5 h6; counter-increment: h3; } h4:not(.no-num) { counter-reset: h5 h6; counter-increment: h4; } h5:not(.no-num) { counter-reset: h6; counter-increment: h5; } h6:not(.no-num) { counter-increment: h6; } h2:not(.no-num):before { content: counter(h2) ". "; } h3:not(.no-num):before { content: counter(h2) "." counter(h3) ". "; } h4:not(.no-num):before { content: counter(h2) "." counter(h3) "." counter(h4) ". "; } h5:not(.no-num):before { content: counter(h2) "." counter(h3) "." counter(h4) "." counter(h5) ". "; } h6:not(.no-num):before { content: counter(h2) "." counter(h3) "." counter(h4) "." counter(h5) "." counter(h6) ". "; } > The second problem could perhaps be addressed in the > definition of the counters function, by making it not include the > "initital" reset. Although that rule would require an exception for when the root reset is the only one in scope. It's simpler to avoid exceptions on exceptions. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, The Mozilla Foundation
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 15:39:22 UTC