w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from May 1997 by date

Saturday, 31 May 1997

KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs) Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs len bullard
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs Norbert H. MIKULA

Friday, 30 May 1997

Re: Parameter entity references Joe English
RE: trivia, but it's a niggle Andrew Layman
XML Coverage in PC Week Tim Bray
RE: trivia, but it's a niggle James Clark
Re: trivia, but it's a niggle James Clark
Re: Parameter entity references Digitome Ltd.
RE: trivia, but it's a niggle Digitome Ltd.
Re: Parameter entity references Eve L. Maler
Re: Parameter entity references lee@sq.com
Re: Parameter entity references len bullard
Deriving XML Link from HyTime Varlink W. Eliot Kimber
RE: trivia, but it's a niggle Andrew Layman

Thursday, 29 May 1997

trivia, but it's a niggle Henry S. Thompson
Re: Parameter entity references Eve L. Maler
Re: Parameter entity references Deborah A. Lapeyre
Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration Murata Makoto
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration James Clark
Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration Murata Makoto
Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts Murata Makoto
Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts Murata Makoto
Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters Murata Makoto
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs len bullard
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs len bullard

Wednesday, 28 May 1997

Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs Peter Murray-Rust
RE: Parameter entity references in WF docs Andrew Layman
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs Bert Bos
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs Paul Grosso
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Andrew Layman
Re: Parameter entity references in WF docs Terry Allen
Parameter entity references in WF docs Tim Bray
Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters Tim Bray
Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts Tim Bray
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Alex Milowski
Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters Gavin Nicol
Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts Gavin Nicol
Re: A modest namespace proposal, in some detail. Martin Bryan
Re: Conformance Digitome Ltd.
Re: Conformance + an apology len bullard
Comments on Part 1: Asian characters Murata Makoto
Re: Conformance + an apology Sam Hunting
Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts Murata Makoto

Tuesday, 27 May 1997

AW: Is ist always possible to define a DTD for Well Formed XMLDocume nts? Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4)
Re: Conformance Digitome Ltd.
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
Re: Conformance lee@sq.com
Re: Conformance + an apology Tim Bray
Re: Conformance + an apology Henry S. Thompson
Re: Conformance + an apology Digitome Ltd
A modest namespace proposal, in some detail. Henry S. Thompson
Another interesting XML page out there Tim Bray
Re: Conformance + an apology Tim Bray
Re: [richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk: conditionals] Murata Makoto
Conformance + an apology Digitome Ltd.
Re: [richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk: conditionals] James Clark

Monday, 26 May 1997

RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Tim Bray
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Andrew Layman
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 len bullard
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 lee@sq.com
[richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk: conditionals] Henry S. Thompson
LT XML toolset, parser, developers' API released Henry S. Thompson
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Digitome Ltd.
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Digitome Ltd.

Sunday, 25 May 1997

RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Tim Bray
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism David G. Durand

Saturday, 24 May 1997

Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 len bullard
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes len bullard
Re: what's a parser's job? [was: RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2] Eve L. Maler
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 lee@sq.com
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Peter Murray-Rust
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes len bullard
Re: what's a parser's job? [was: RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Versi on 2] len bullard
Re: what's a parser's job? [was: RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2] len bullard
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Tim Bray
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Martin Bryan
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Henry S. Thompson
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Arjun Ray
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Digitome Ltd.
RE: Thoughts on namespaces James Clark
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Paul Grosso
Re: I fought MS Word, and MS Word won Arjun Ray
RE: what's a parser's job? [was: RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Versi on 2] Andrew Layman
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Andrew Layman
I fought MS Word, and MS Word won Michael Sperberg-McQueen
what's a parser's job? [was: RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2] lee@sq.com
RE: DSIGS Andrew Layman
Re: Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) Paul Prescod
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
Re: DSIGS Paul Prescod
RE: Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) Andrew Layman
Re: Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) Matthew Fuchs
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Michael Sperberg-McQueen
DSIGS Andrew Layman
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Bert Bos
Really short end tags altheim
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements Bert Bos

Friday, 23 May 1997

RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Matthew Fuchs
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Bert Bos
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Bert Bos
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Paul Grosso
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
Re: Thoughts on namespaces W. Eliot Kimber
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: A uestion and possible problem Michael Sperberg-McQueen
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Christopher R. Maden
Re: MathML draft finished Bert Bos
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Steven J. DeRose
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Steven J. DeRose
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Arjun Ray
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Steven J. DeRose
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Andrew Layman
RE: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
RE: Namespaces Andrew Layman
RE: Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) Andrew Layman
RE: Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) Andrew Layman
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Christopher R. Maden
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism David G. Durand
RE: Namespaces David G. Durand
RE: Namespaces Andrew Layman
Re: A uestion and possible problem Henry S. Thompson
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Steven J. DeRose
Re: A uestion and possible problem Gavin Nicol
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Gavin Nicol
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements Gavin Nicol
Re: Namespaces Paul Prescod
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Martin Bryan
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Martin Bryan
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Martin Bryan
RE: Namespaces Martin Bryan
Re: SD4 - Schema format Henry S. Thompson
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Henry S. Thompson
Re: A uestion and possible problem Henry S. Thompson
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Martin Bryan
Re: SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Arjun Ray
Re: Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) Arjun Ray
RE: Constraining discussion to technical matters Jon Bosak
Semi-transparent Syntax Extensions (was Re: SD5 - Namespaces) Arjun Ray
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Arjun Ray
Re: Is ist always possible to define a DTD for Well Formed XML Docume nts? W. Eliot Kimber
RE: Constraining discussion to technical matters Andrew Layman
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Joe English
SD5 - Namespaces - New Version 2 Andrew Layman
Constraining discussion to technical matters altheim
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Peter Flynn
Re: SD5 - Namespaces len bullard
Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only len bullard
RE: Thoughts on namespaces Andrew Layman
RE: On constraining/validating datatypes Andrew Layman

Thursday, 22 May 1997

Re: Is ist always possible to define a DTD for Well Formed XML Docume nts? Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Thoughts on namespaces--Several active within one element, No DTD changes. Matthew Fuchs
Re: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism W. Eliot Kimber
Re: Link-5: Extended Contextual Links Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Paul Grosso
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Paul Grosso
HDML review requested Jon Bosak
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Peter Murray-Rust
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Link-4: Extended Linking Group Indirection Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements Michael Sperberg-McQueen
RE: Thoughts on namespaces--No ambiguity Andrew Layman
Re: Link-1: Syntax Michael Sperberg-McQueen
RE: Thoughts on namespaces--Several active within one element, No DTD changes. Andrew Layman
XS discussion begins Jon Bosak
Re: Thoughts on namespaces W. Eliot Kimber
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Joe English
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Christopher R. Maden
Re: On constraining/validating datatypes Eve L. Maler
Re: Thoughts on namespaces W. Eliot Kimber
On constraining/validating datatypes Steven J. DeRose
RE: SD5 - Namespaces Andrew Layman
Re: Thoughts on namespaces Paul Grosso
Thoughts on namespaces Christopher R. Maden
RE: Namespaces Andrew Layman
A uestion and possible problem Gavin Nicol
RE: SD5 - Namespaces Gavin Nicol
RE: SD5 - Namespaces Andrew Layman
Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only Gavin Nicol
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Gavin Nicol
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Gavin Nicol
RE: SD5 - Namespaces Gavin Nicol
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only Peter Flynn
Re:Namespaces Digitome Ltd.
RE: SD5 - Namespaces Tim Bray
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements James Clark
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements James Clark
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Paul Prescod
Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only len bullard
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] len bullard
Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only len bullard
Re: SD5 - Namespaces len bullard

Wednesday, 21 May 1997

Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: SD4 - Schema format Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Eve L. Maler
RE: SD5 - Namespaces Andrew Layman
RE: SD5 - Namespaces Andrew Layman
RE: Data types again Andrew Layman
Re: Comments on XML-Link Spec David Durand
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes David Durand
Re: Data types again Paul Prescod
Re: Data types again Paul Grosso
ERB disposition of "SD" issues Jon Bosak
Bray's initial comments on SD1-5 David Durand
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements David Durand
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements David Durand
Re: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level David Durand
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism David Durand
Re: Link-1: Syntax David Durand
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements David Durand
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism David Durand
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Gavin Nicol
More empty end tag statistics Gavin Nicol
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Matthew Fuchs
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Steven J. DeRose
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Steven J. DeRose
Re: Link-4: Extended Linking Group Indirection Christopher R. Maden
Re: SD4 - Schema format Martin Bryan
Two Cents on the Potential Cost of Short End Tags Eric Johnson
Re: Data types again Gavin Nicol
Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only Gavin Nicol
Comments on Relative URLs (Part 1, 4.3.2) Murata Makoto
RE: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Gavin Nicol
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Data types again Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Gavin Nicol
Comments on [57] of Part 1 Murata Makoto
Data types again Tim Bray
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Peter Flynn
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Martin Bryan
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Digitome Ltd.
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Jon Bosak
Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only Peter Flynn
RE: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level James Clark
Re: SD5 - Namespaces James Clark
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Joe English
Re: SD5 - Namespaces altheim

Tuesday, 20 May 1997

Re: SD5 - Namespaces len bullard
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] len bullard
Re: Abandoning XML len bullard
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Paul Grosso
Re: Comments on XML-Link Spec Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] len bullard
Re: Require XML version? len bullard
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] lee@sq.com
Re: Comments on XML-Link Spec Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Matthew Fuchs
Re: Distinguishing Attributes and Content Matthew Fuchs

Monday, 19 May 1997

Re: Link-1: Syntax Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4)
Re: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4)

Tuesday, 20 May 1997

Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only Steven J. DeRose
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Steven J. DeRose

Monday, 19 May 1997

Is ist always possible to define a DTD for Well Formed XML Docume nts? Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4)

Tuesday, 20 May 1997

Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] altheim
Re: Distinguishing Attributes and Content Paul Prescod
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] lee@sq.com
Re:Abandoning XML Digitome Ltd.
Re: Distinguishing Attributes and Content Paul Prescod
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Matthew Fuchs
Re: Comments on XML-Link Spec Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Distinguishing Attributes and Content Matthew Fuchs
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Eduardo Gutentag
RE: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Steven J. DeRose
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Paul Grosso

Sunday, 18 May 1997

Re: SD1 - Proposal: allow in valid XML-Documents only Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4)

Tuesday, 20 May 1997

Re: SD5 - Namespaces Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Extended Contextual Links ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk

Saturday, 17 May 1997

Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4)

Tuesday, 20 May 1997

Re: Information Week covers XML Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Require XML version? Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Link-4: Extended Linking Group Indirection Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Link-4: Extended Linking Group Indirection Martin Bryan
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) Martin Bryan
Re: SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] Martin Bryan
Information Week covers XML Tim Bray
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism James Clark
RE: Link-2: Pseudo-elements James Clark
RE: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Peter Flynn
Re: SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] Arjun Ray
Re: Abandoning XML Joe English
Re: Abandoning XML Paul Prescod
RE: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level James K. Tauber
RE: Link-2: Pseudo-elements James K. Tauber

Monday, 19 May 1997

Re: SD1 - Short End Tags bbauma1@cs.umbc.edu
Require XML version? Paul Prescod
Re: SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] Paul Grosso
Re: SD4 - Schema Format [fmt] Paul Grosso
Re: SD3 - Data Types [fmt] Paul Grosso
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes [fmt] Paul Grosso
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Paul Grosso
Re: Link-4: Extended Linking Group Indirection Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes [fmt] Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Paul Prescod
Re: Shorttags compromise proposal. Paul Prescod
Abandoning XML Andrew Layman
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags lee@sq.com
RE: SD2 - Structured Attributes Andrew Layman
RE: Shorttags compromise proposal. Andrew Layman
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Dave Hollander
RE: SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] Andrew Layman
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Paul Prescod
Re: SD3 - Data Types [fmt] Gavin Nicol
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements Steven J. DeRose
RE: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Gavin Nicol
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements altheim
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Paul Prescod
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes [fmt] Paul Prescod
RE: Link-2: Pseudo-elements Steven J. DeRose
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Andrew Layman
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) altheim
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Dave Hollander
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Andrew Layman
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags - minimising data _with_ end tags Matthew Fuchs
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Steven J. DeRose
Re: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Gavin Nicol
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Steven J. DeRose
Re: XML 1.0 priorities Steven J. DeRose
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Dave Hollander
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Gavin Nicol
Re: Link issues Michel Biezunski
Re: XML 1.0 priorities Gavin Nicol
re LINK-1 Lou Burnard
Re: Link-1: Syntax Martin Bryan
Re: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Martin Bryan
Re: Link-5: Extended Contextual Links Martin Bryan
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) Martin Bryan
Re: SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] Tim Bray
Re: SD4 - Schema Format [fmt] Tim Bray
Re: SD3 - Data Types [fmt] Tim Bray
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes [fmt] Tim Bray
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Tim Bray
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements James Clark
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements James Clark
RE: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level James K. Tauber

Sunday, 18 May 1997

Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Deborah A. Lapeyre
RE: SD3 - Data Types Andrew Layman
Re: Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Link-5: Extended Contextual Links Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Link-4: Extended Linking Group Indirection Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Link-2: Pseudo-elements Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) Paul Prescod
Re: Link issues Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) James Clark
RE: Link-2: Pseudo-elements James K. Tauber
RE: Link-1: Syntax James K. Tauber
SD5 - Namespaces (Implementation questions) Peter Murray-Rust
Link-6: Addressing at the sub-element level Tim Bray
Link-5: Extended Contextual Links Tim Bray
Link-4: Extended Linking Group Indirection Tim Bray
Link-3: Sets, Singletons, and Determinism Tim Bray
Link-2: Pseudo-elements Tim Bray
Link-1: Syntax Tim Bray
Link issues Tim Bray
Web Review covers XML Tim Bray
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Paul Prescod
Re: SD3 - Data Types Paul Prescod
Re: SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] Paul Prescod
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Paul Grosso
Shorttags compromise proposal. Paul Prescod
Re: Short tags Paul Prescod

Saturday, 17 May 1997

RE:Short tags lee@sq.com
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] lee@sq.com
Re: SD5 - Namespaces Peter Murray-Rust
Clarification to Comments on XML-Link Eric Johnson
Comments on XML-Link Spec Eric Johnson
Introducing Myself Eric Johnson
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Digitome Ltd.
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Digitome Ltd.
example of xml-notation (was Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt]) Rick Jelliffe
Re: SD4 - Schema Format [fmt] Rick Jelliffe
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Jon Bosak
Re: SD4 - Schema format Robert Streich
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Arjun Ray
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Andrew Layman
RE: SD2 - Structured Attributes Andrew Layman
Re: SD4 - Schema Format [fmt] James Clark
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags James Clark
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Arjun Ray
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags len bullard
Re: Short tags len bullard
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Andrew Layman
RE:Short tags Andrew Layman
Re: MathML draft finished Peter Flynn
Re: SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] altheim
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags len bullard
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags len bullard
Re: XML 1.0 priorities Peter Murray-Rust

Friday, 16 May 1997

Re: SD4 - Schema format len bullard
RE: SD1 - Short End Tags Jean Paoli
RE: SD3 - Data Types Andrew Layman
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Matthew Fuchs
XML 1.0 priorities Jon Bosak
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] altheim
Re: SD3 - Data Types Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD3 - Data Types Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Jon Bosak
MathML draft finished Jon Bosak
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Gavin Nicol
SD5 - Namespaces [fmt] Jon Bosak
SD4 - Schema Format [fmt] Jon Bosak
SD3 - Data Types [fmt] Jon Bosak
SD2 - Structured Attributes [fmt] Jon Bosak
SD1 - Short End Tags [fmt] Jon Bosak
XML for Structured Data [fmt] Jon Bosak
About to post reformatted questions Jon Bosak
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Arjun Ray
Re: SD3 - Data Types Matthew Fuchs
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Dave Hollander
Re: SD3 - Data Types Steven J. DeRose
Re: SD3 - Data Types Dave Hollander
Re: SD1 - Short End Tags Dave Hollander
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Dave Hollander
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes: Paul Prescod
SD2 - Structured Attributes: Robin Cover
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) lee@sq.com
Re: XML for Structured Data altheim
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Matthew Fuchs
Re: SD3 - Data Types Matthew Fuchs
Re: SD4 - Schema format Paul Prescod
Re: SD4 - Schema format Robert Streich
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Robert Streich
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Paul Prescod
Re: SD4 - Schema format Martin Bryan
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes lee@sq.com
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Steven J. DeRose
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Martin Bryan
Re: SD4 - Schema format: relation to existing XML-lang Henry S. Thompson
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Dave Hollander
RE: SD2 - Structured Attributes James Clark
Re: SD4 - Schema format Peter Murray-Rust
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Gavin Nicol
Re: SD4 - Schema format Henry S. Thompson
SD5 - alternates using PIs, using mulitple DOCTYPE Rick Jelliffe
Re: XML for Structured Data Peter Murray-Rust
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes Rick Jelliffe
Re: XML for Structured Data altheim
RE: SD2 - Structured Attributes Andrew Layman
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes James Clark
Re: SD2 - Structured Attributes altheim
SD1 - Short End Tags Jean Paoli
SD4 - Schema Format Jean Paoli
SD5 - Namespaces Jean Paoli
SD3 - Data Types Jean Paoli
XML for Structured Data Jean Paoli
SD2 - Structured Attributes Jean Paoli
MathML Paul Prescod
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Paul Prescod
Re: XML *is* SGML len bullard
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Paul Prescod
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Paul Prescod
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Paul Prescod

Thursday, 15 May 1997

Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Peter Murray-Rust

Friday, 16 May 1997

Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Robert Streich
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Robert Streich

Thursday, 15 May 1997

Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Jon Bosak
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Bert Bos
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Bert Bos
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Steven J. DeRose
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Bert Bos
Re: XML *is* SGML Bert Bos
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Paul Prescod
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Alex Milowski
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Paul Prescod
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Peter Flynn
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Rick Jelliffe
Re: XML *is* SGML Paul Prescod
Re: XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Gavin Nicol
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Gavin Nicol
XML, SGML & the Web (was: Shorthand for default attributes) Bert Bos
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Bert Bos
Re: XML *is* SGML Bert Bos
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Rick Jelliffe
Namespace debate to begin again Jon Bosak
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Paul Prescod
Re: Are PIs useful? len bullard
XML *is* SGML James Clark
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Rick Jelliffe

Wednesday, 14 May 1997

Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Paul Prescod

Monday, 8 January 1990

Inter@ctive week covers XML Tim Bray

Wednesday, 14 May 1997

Re: Shorthand for default attributes (was: Re: Whitespace) David Durand
Re: Shorthand for default attributes (was: Re: Whitespace) Paul Prescod
Re: Are PIs useful? Paul Prescod
Re: Are PIs useful? Bert Bos
Re: Shorthand for default attributes (was: Re: Whitespace) Bert Bos
Re: PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Gavin Nicol
PIFLE (was Re: Are PIs useful?) Rick Jelliffe

Sunday, 7 January 1990

Re: Betting our lives on error handling Tim Bray

Wednesday, 14 May 1997

Re: Are PIs useful? Digitome Ltd.

Tuesday, 13 May 1997

Re: Are PIs useful? Alex Milowski
Are PIs useful? Paul Prescod
Re: Shorthand for default attributes (was: Re: Whitespace) David Durand
Re: Shorthand for default attributes (was: Re: Whitespace) Bert Bos
Re: Shorthand for default attributes (was: Re: Whitespace) Alex Milowski

Monday, 12 May 1997

Shorthand for default attributes (was: Re: Whitespace) Bert Bos
Re: Whitespace Michael Sperberg-McQueen

Sunday, 11 May 1997

Re: Whitespace Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Whitespace Bert Bos
Re: Whitespace Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Whitespace Bert Bos
Re: SGML WG status Paul Grosso

Saturday, 10 May 1997

Re: Betting our lives on error handling Peter Murray-Rust
Deferring Error handling + conformance testing Digitome Ltd.
Re: Betting our lives on error handling altheim
Re: Betting our lives on error handling len bullard
Re: Notes on the process len bullard

Friday, 9 May 1997

Re: Notes on the process Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Betting our lives on error handling lee@sq.com
Re: Notes on the process Paul Prescod
Bill's example Tim Bray
Re: Notes on the process Matthew Fuchs
Re: Notes on the process Gavin Nicol
Re: Notes on the process Todd Freter
Re: SGML WG status Jon Bosak
Re: Notes on the process Jon Bosak
Re: ERB votes on error handling Dave Hollander
Re: Notes on the process Todd Freter
Re: Betting our lives on error handling Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Notes on the process Gavin Nicol
Betting our lives on error handling lee@sq.com
Re: Notes on the process Bill Smith
Re: A radical simplification Bill Smith
Re: Notes on the process altheim
Re: Notes on the process Jon Bosak

Thursday, 8 May 1997

Re: SGML WG status altheim
Re: Notes on the process Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Whitespace Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Whitespace Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Notes on the process Todd Freter
Re: SGML WG status Jon Bosak
Re: Notes on the process Bill Smith
Re: Notes on the process Gavin Nicol
A radical simplification Henry S. Thompson
Re: Notes on the process Bill Smith
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Paul Prescod
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Steven J. DeRose
Re: ERB votes on error handling Gavin Nicol
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Paul Prescod

Wednesday, 7 May 1997

Re: SGML WG status Digitome Ltd

Thursday, 8 May 1997

Re: ERB votes on error handling len bullard
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Arjun Ray
Re: Whitespace Joe English
Re: ERB votes on error handling Bill Smith
Re: ERB votes on error handling Murata Makoto
XML FAQ v1.0 Peter Flynn
Upcoming work items Tim Bray
Notes on the process Tim Bray
Re: Whitespace Tim Bray
Re: ERB votes on error handling Michael Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 7 May 1997

Re: Whitespace Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Re: ERB votes on error handling Peter Flynn
Re: ERB votes on error handling Eve L. Maler
Re: Altavista "Language Tags"? Peter Flynn
Re: Altavista "Language Tags"? Peter Flynn
Re: ERB votes on error handling Gavin Nicol
Re: ERB votes on error handling Bill Smith
Re: ERB votes on error handling altheim
ERB votes on error handling Tim Bray
Re: Whitespace Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Altavista "Language Tags"? Bert Bos
PERef to empty Entity in AttDef Norbert H. MIKULA
Altavista "Language Tags"? Tim Bray
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Paul Prescod
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Gavin Nicol
Whitespace Peter Murray-Rust
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Paul Prescod
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling lee@sq.com
Re: SGML WG status Paul Prescod
Re: Re Jon on Error Paul Prescod
Re: Final words, I think, on error handling Eve L. Maler
Re: SGML WG status Tim Bray
Re: Error Handling Tim Bray
Re: SGML WG status Peter Murray-Rust
Final words, I think, on error handling Tim Bray
Re: Error Handling Bill Smith
Re: Re Jon on Error len bullard
Re: SGML WG status altheim
Re: Error Handling Paul Prescod

Tuesday, 6 May 1997

Re Jon on Error Terry Allen
Re Jon on Error Terry Allen
Re: Error Handling Tim Bray
Re: SGML WG status Terry Allen
Error Handling Paul Prescod
SGML WG status Jon Bosak

Monday, 5 May 1997

Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Norbert H. MIKULA
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Norbert H. MIKULA
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) C M Sperberg-McQueen
Re: Information components (DTD fragments) Paul Prescod
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Terry Allen
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Tim Bray
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Terry Allen
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Terry Allen
Re: Fwd: QWeb 1.1 Bert Bos
Re: Fwd: QWeb 1.1 Gavin Nicol
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Bert Bos
Re: Information components (DTD fragments) Peter Murray-Rust
Introducing myself Bert Bos
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) James Clark
Re: Information components (DTD fragments) Tim Bray
Re: Articles in PC Week Tim Bray

Sunday, 4 May 1997

Re: A modest proposal for namespaces Henry S. Thompson
Re: XML FAQ: Answers needed Peter Flynn
Re: A modest proposal for namespaces Jon Bosak
A modest proposal for namespaces Henry S. Thompson
Re: Information components (DTD fragments) Jon Bosak
Information components (DTD fragments) Peter Murray-Rust
Re: DTD Fragments and XML David Durand
Articles in PC Week Jon Bosak
Re: XML FAQ: Answers needed Jon Bosak
Re: XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Norbert H. MIKULA
Re: XML FAQ: Answers needed lee@sq.com
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Harvey Bingham
Re: XML FAQ: Answers needed Harvey Bingham
XDB 0.3 available (XMLized Docbook 3.0) Terry Allen

Saturday, 3 May 1997

Re: DTD Fragments and XML Peter Murray-Rust
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Terry Allen
XML FAQ: Answers needed Peter Flynn
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Paul Prescod
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Paul Prescod
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Peter Murray-Rust
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Peter Flynn
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Joe English
Re: DTD Fragments and XML Terry Allen
Re: PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading len bullard
Re: PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading len bullard
DTD Fragments and XML Paul Prescod

Friday, 2 May 1997

Fwd: QWeb 1.1 Christopher R. Maden
Re: PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading Jon Bosak
Re: PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading Peter Flynn
Re: PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading Paul Prescod
Re: PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading Todd Freter
Re: PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading Alex Milowski
PC Magazine, John Dvorak - depressing reading Digitome Ltd

Thursday, 1 May 1997

Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it Ralph Ferris
Re: Sudden death: request for missing input David Durand
RE: Error handling: yes, I did mean it Paul Grosso
Re: News from the ERB Peter Murray-Rust

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 1997 17:08:10 UTC