- From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 19:54:44 +1000
- To: "Jean Paoli" <jeanpa@microsoft.com>, "'w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org'" <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
Here is an alternate version of the SD5 example, using PIs rather than "<*"
<XML>
<!-- processing header -->
<?xml-schema ref="http://www.bigbookstore.com/schema" gi-prefix="bk" ?>
<?xml-schema ref="http://www.w3.org" gi-prefix="org.w3.www" ?>
<?xml-schema ref="http://purl.org/dublincore" gi-prefix="dc" ?>
<?xml-schema ref="http://www.shipping.com" gi-prefix="sh" ?>
<?xml-nature class="attribute" gi-root="org.w3.www.DSIG" ?>
<!-- data body -->
<bk.ORDERS>
<LINEITEM XML-ID="LI1">
<dc.NAME>Number, the Language of Science</dc.NAME>
<dc.AUTHOR>Dantzig</dc.AUTHOR>
<PRICE>5.95</PRICE>
<sh.ZONE>9</sh.ZONE>
<org.w3.www.DSIG>
<DIGEST>1234567890</DIGEST>
<SIGNER>AndrewL@microsoft.com</SIGNER>
</org.w3.www.DSIG>
</LINEITEM >
</bk.ORDERS>
</XML>
To me this is cleaner, less confusing, and compatible with SGML.
If the schema is merely a substitute DTD entity cross-reference,
it seems a reinvention of the wheel, since SGML already has a construct
for that (DOCTYPE) which, if it is not enough, should be improved rather
than discarded.
<!DOCTYPE #IMPLIED SYSTEM
[
<!-- namespaces and schemas -->
<!DOCTYPE #PREFIX bk
SYSTEM "http://www.bigbookstore.com/schema" >
<!DOCTYPE #PREFIX org.w3.www
SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org" >
<!DOCTYPE #PREFIX dc
SYSTEM "http://purl.org/dublincore" >
<!DOCTYPE #PREFIX sh
SYSTEM "http://www.shipping.com">
<!-- define special natures for elements -->
<?xml-nature class="attribute" gi-root="org.w3.www.DSIG" ?>
]>
<XML>
<bk.ORDERS>
<LINEITEM XML-ID="LI1">
<dc.NAME>Number, the Language of Science</dc.NAME>
<dc.AUTHOR>Dantzig</dc.AUTHOR>
<PRICE>5.95</PRICE>
<sh.ZONE>9</sh.ZONE>
<org.w3.www.DSIG>
<DIGEST>1234567890</DIGEST>
<SIGNER>AndrewL@microsoft.com</SIGNER>
</org.w3.www.DSIG>
</LINEITEM >
</bk.ORDERS>
</XML>
Rick Jelliffe
Received on Friday, 16 May 1997 05:54:51 UTC