- From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 13:52:52 -0700
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
From: Jean Paoli <jeanpa@microsoft.com> To: "'w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org'" <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org> Subject: SD5 - Namespaces Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 21:14:20 -0700 SD5 - Namespaces: ----------------------------- Consumers of a document may need to verify that it uses a known namespace. For example, the document may declare, in effect, "This is an OSF banking document. If you know what that means, this is confirmation you have the right document type." We need a mechanism for identifying schemata so readers of a document can tell what the element names mean. At the same time, the namespace of schema ids must be open and unlimitedly extensible, without requiring any central naming authority (beyond whatever mechanisms already exist for the web). Additionally, we want to make it common that documents incorporate elements and attributes from multiple schemata. For instance, within a document about book orders, we might reasonably find elements such as "author" defined by the Dublin Core, other elements such as "price" that are particular to the book order application, and still other elements, such as digital signatures, common to many applications. (One advantage of common terms is that we can pass elements across organizational boundaries.) However, there is a problem with including names from multiple schemata: common, easily understood terms such as "name," "type," "size," "location" etc. are likely to be defined in many schemata. While each definition makes sense in the context of the defining schema, when a document uses several schemata the names will clash (if not initially, then as schemata evolve). We need a mechanism for avoiding such conflicts. Within every portion of a document, it must be unambiguous from which namespace each name originates. Proposal: Every element comes from some schema, which becomes the default schema for that element. The names within the default schema are usable within the element without qualification. Names from other schemata are also usable (provided they are compatible with the elements definition) but must always be qualified. Every element can have one or more foreign schemata introduced to it by a well-known attribute which refers to a schema by URI, and gives it a short name used for qualification. <XML> <*xml-schema xml-ref="http://www.bigbookstore.com/schema" xml-as="bk" /> <*xml-schema xml-ref="http://www.w3.org" xml-as="org.w3.www" /> <bk.ORDERS> <*xml-schema xml-ref="http://purl.org/dublincore" xml-as="dc" /> <*xml-schema xml-ref="http://www.shipping.com" xml-as="sh" /> <LINEITEM XML-ID="LI1"> <dc.NAME>Number, the Language of Science</dc.NAME> <dc.AUTHOR>Dantzig</dc.AUTHOR> <PRICE>5.95</PRICE> <sh.ZONE>9</sh.ZONE> <*org.w3.www.DSIG> <*DIGEST>1234567890</DIGEST> <*SIGNER>AndrewL@microsoft.com</></org.w3.www.DSIG> </LINEITEM ></ORDERS></XML> In the example above, bk.ORDERS comes from the bigbookstore schema. Consequently, terms such as lineitem and price, presumably defined in that schema, do not need qualification when used within bk.ORDERS. However, the terms NAME and AUTHOR are drawn from a schema transcending bookstores; they come from the Dublin Core document identified by the URI "http://purl.org/dublincore". Similarly, the DSIG element is defined within the "http://www.w3.org" schema. -----------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 16 May 1997 16:53:24 UTC