- From: Digitome Ltd. <sean@digitome.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 06:13:50 +0100
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
[Alex Milowski] >Because processing instructions are "single use" I consider them to be a >hack. I don't find them useful in SGML. IMHO, the use of processing >instructions in XML to convey encodings and other information is rather >borderline but I understand why they are used for that purpose. The only time I have ever used PI's in a document and felt happy about it was an experimental Knuth'ish tangle/weave thing with bits like this:- <?Perl $n = 0;> <RootElement> <?Perl print "Bit that goes wrong starts here. Iter = " , $n;$n++;> Passing parsed instances of such things through an applet that fishes for, and executes Perl snippits is something I have found useful. The 8879 maxim of treating processing instructions as if they are "not there" in terms of the data/markup RE divide has bitten me more than once though:-) Sean Sean Mc Grath digitome@iol.ie Digitome Electronic Publishing http://www.digitome.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 1997 01:38:00 UTC