- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 08:59:19 -0700
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> From: Jean Paoli <jeanpa@microsoft.com> > Schemas are structured data, yet their current representation (DTD) > does not leverage work invested in the XML document instance. ... > > Proposal: All machine-readable schemata, whatever their other > characteristics, are structured data, and so XML itself is a good > carrier syntax for schema expression. We should design a general > structure for writing schemata in XML. The new types of schema that are being proposed include a lot of things that are not covered by DTDs. Thus we have three choices: 1. use XML syntax 2. radically extend DTD syntax 3. invent a new syntax Of these, the first seems desirable, the second questionable, and the third idiotic. As with data typing and namespace issues, I think this new work belongs not in XML-lang but in a new small volume in the lang/link/display series. This is not realistically achievable in the July 1 timeframe. It's hard and is going to require thorough exploration. -Tim
Received on Monday, 19 May 1997 02:59:43 UTC