- From: Dave Hollander <dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 09:41:07 -0600
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Bill Smith <bsmith@atlantic-82.Eng.Sun.COM> wrote: > > I object strenusously to both the outcome of this "vote" and the process > itself. Clearly consensus was not even remotely reached on this issue. Any > review of the archives would show this as would a simple count of the > "votes". For the record, as a Nay in the tally, I must disagree. I feel that this vote was very significant for the long-term health of XML and I not only support the outcome, I strenuously defend the process by which it was derived. My Nay was only in regards to how the intention was expressed; I was hoping to find wording that is more readily understandable (yes, editors can error recover) and provide fewer opportunities to comply to the letter but not the spirit (wiggle room). Not having found more precise wording, I must agree with the group to accept the wording and move on. Regards, Dave Hollander
Received on Friday, 9 May 1997 11:49:55 UTC