- From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 12:20:13 +0100
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 02:14 23/5/97 +0100, Peter Flynn wrote: >Can't we just use CONCUR syntax? Parsers already have code to handle it >and isn't this just really CONCUR in disguise? > ><(CML)VAR foo=bar>blort</(CML)VAR> ><(MathML)FRAC>99<(MathML)OVER/>100</(MathML)FRAC> There is a difference - its a scoped CONCUR. What we are really talking about is having a CONCUR constuct that has the well defined scope within the instance of a SUBDOC (while at the same time being able to cross-reference from scope to scope.) This is the new beastie that you need to deal with on-the-fly fragment concatenation. The real question is "What is the role of a DTD when you do on-the-fly fragement concatenation?". ---- Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 WWW home page: http://www.sgml.u-net.com/
Received on Friday, 23 May 1997 07:20:20 UTC