- From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 07:43:47 -0400
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
Let's say that I am an XML user. I am happy with, say, the DocBook DTD, but need to insert a chemical formula in CML format. Or perhaps I want to insert something more mundane, some small element that does not have an expression in DocBook: <GRADE> for a student's grade on a project. In the SGML world I would combine the two DTDs manually. This is probably a painful process of examining content models and parameter entities and finding the right place to shoe-horn in my element type. I don't think that we can really expect that to happen often in the XML world. People will just remove the DOCTYPE line and depend on well-formedness. But having removed the DOCTYPE line, they have now taken all responsibility for the semantics of that document upon themselves. It can no longer be validated. The user agent cannot use any "hard coded" knowledge of the semantics (with no doctype it doesn't know what namespace the gis are from). "Alternate" stylesheets (e.g. text to speech) are no longer useful (same problem). Search engines cannot depend on the meta-data to be accurate. In short, I've hobbled the interoperability of the document. We are all hurt by "tag soup", but perhaps the visually impaired are the most hurt by it. I'm sure they don't want to surf the web by continually reconfiguring their browsers from scratch because authors have not properly declared their namespaces. In my mind this is where the rubber meets the road. The rubber is generic markup, where the needs of the data are paramount: add an element if you need it. The road is the Internet where interoperability is paramount. It seems to me that in XML it is too hard to balance these factors. I don't think that we can make it easy to combine DTDs without changing SGML. But maybe we can figure out a way to declare a namespace for elements: to "import" element names in a standard way. You wouldn't be able to validate the document but at least it would be clear what the elements MEAN. Paul Prescod
Received on Saturday, 3 May 1997 07:47:53 UTC