- From: Eduardo Gutentag <Eduardo.Gutentag@Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 09:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> I'd turn it around and say if space/transfer volume savings is so > important, use short tag names and compression schemes. Compression > and decompression are much simplier, smaller, and more ubiquitous > applications than XML-parsing, GI-inserting applications. > > paul > I must side with Paul (and not just because I'm a desperate hacker in no matter what language I happen to deal with;-). A 40% reduction achieved just by shortening end tags indicates that there is more tagging than content. Surely a database application can deal with <A> <b>foo</b> <c>bar</c> </A> as easily as with <author> <firstname>foo</firstname> <lastname>bar</lastname> </author> (and there you have a 46% reduction without having to change the spec...) Eduardo
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 1997 12:55:08 UTC