- From: Peter Murray-Rust <Peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 22:28:32 GMT
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
In message <1.5.4.32.19970519084336.006cc350@mail.u-net.com> Martin Bryan writes: > At 10:03 18/5/97 GMT, Peter Murray-Rust wrote: [...] > >Example > ><![CDATA[ > > > ><!DOCTYPE cml SYSTEM "cml.dtd" [ <!-- unqualified, just as an example --> > ><!-- an additional version the math dtd *using* FQNames; i.e. long-winded --> > ><!entity % mathml SYSTEM "http://www.w3.org/some/where/fqmathml.dtd"> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >%mathml; > >]> > ><CML> > ><MOL Title="benzene"> > >... > ><XLIST TITLE="symmetry operators"> > ><?XML-DOCTYPE DOCTYPE="org.w3.mathml"?> ^^^^^ B ^^^^^^ [...] > Nice idea - one question though. Should it be required that the doctype be > declared as part of the relevant document type definition? At present there > seems to be no link between the DTD declared as %mathml in the internal > subset and that used in the XML-DOCTYPE PI. I can see a good case for a You are right, of course. I used the first because I assumed that a SYSTEM had to use a 'filename', but I much prefer the entity approach. > formal definition of the relevant doctype as an entity and then using > XML-DOCTYPE to point to this, giving it a statement along the lines > <?XML-DOCTYLE DTD="mathml">. This has one ancilliary benefit. Instead of > qualifying each embedded DTD's element name with a long URL it needs only be > qualified by a short (parameter) entity name. This would also match subdoc > (and concur) much more neatly as here it is the DTD name that is used to ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > "qualify" the element name. Anything that is 8879-style would be preferred - my reading doesn't extend to these - even after your very generous present :-) <A HREF="#fn1"> <PROPOSAL> We should identify a character (Tim has suggested ':') for indicating hierarchy in qualified names for GIs. Even if we can't resolve whether we should use it *now*, it may help in internal representations and temporary files. '.' had the advantage of being DNS and Java-friendly, but maybe it's a good idea to choose a different one for that reason. </PROPOSAL> P. <FOOTNOTE ID="fn1">SGML An Author's Guide</FOOTNOTE> -- Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection Virtual School of Molecular Sciences http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/
Received on Monday, 19 May 1997 17:53:26 UTC