- From: Paul Grosso <paul@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 14:04:55 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 13:00 1997 05 21 -0700, Tim Bray wrote: >I have revised my paper on data typing at > >[1] http://www.textuality.com/xml/typing.html > I don't feel data typing needs to be part of XML--it is not within the "minimum needed to declare victory." Therefore, I would vote against any proposal regarding data typing that puts a necessary burden on XML implementors or users or that extends the time frame for getting out the XML spec. However, I do believe data typing would be useful, and I would therefore be in favor of putting our assembled intelligence to the task of addressing this issue provided it is done as a separate "module" of the larger "XML-inspired" work. So, on DT-1, I am ambivalent, but finally come down saying we should consider data typing as part of the XML work. On DT-2, data typing should be a separate module in the XML series, and its support must not be a requirement of an XML system. On DT-4 and DT-5, I think data typing should work on attribute values and content (both character and mixed if feasible). I would favor making any necessary simplification (e.g., for mixed content, ignore subelements) to allow even an "80% solution." On the other points, I have no strong feelings at this time. paul
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 1997 15:08:42 UTC