heads-up: /2006/webapi/Binding4DOM moved to /2006/webapi/WebIDL
[D3E] Multiple keyboard identifiers
ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
Re: How Open is Open?
[AC] Hardening against DNS rebinding attacks - proposal
ISSUE-22 (Is SHA1 good enough?): Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures?
ISSUE-21: should Widgets 1.0 allow fallback for <content> element? [Widgets]
ISSUE-20 (Content multi-view): Current <content> model does not allow multiple views [Widgets]
ISSUE-19: Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required use cases and requirements [Widgets]
Re: Using #waf for June 26 Widgets Call [Was: Agenda for 26 June 2008 Widgets Voice Conference]
ISSUE-18 (api-availability): Need to efine a mechanism to check for the availability of an API [Widgets]
[widgets] Minutes of 26 June 2008 Voice Conference
ProgressEvent unification / loaded attribute / "stalled" event
ISSUE-17: Widgets (not just widget engines) should be able to specify which proxies they communicate through
ISSUE-16: Do widgets need their own URI scheme? [Widgets]
ISSUE-15: Allow or deny installing additional digital certificates on widget engines? [Widgets]
[widgets] Timeless' Widgets Requirements LC
F2F Agenda Updated
Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
Reminder: DOM3 Events Telcon Cancelled, Resumes in 2 Weeks
[Widgets] Requirements LC Comment Tracker
Re: Call for Review: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Requirements
[XHR2] xhr.upload and abort and error events
Re: Initial input for discussion of Widget security model
[XHR2] upload complete flag
ISSUE-14 (opt-into-methods-headers): Opting into methods/headers [Access Control]
ISSUE-13 (opting-into-cookies): Opting into cookies [Access Control]
ISSUE-12 (access-control-policy-path): IIS and Access-Control-Policy-Path [Access Control]
ISSUE-11 (security-model): What is the Security Model for the access-control spec? [Access Control]
ISSUE-10 (client-server): Client and Server model [Access Control]
Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
Re: ElementTraversal progress?
[XHR] Request charset is limited to UTF-8 for x-www-form-urlencoded data
Re: Origin (was: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback)
[widgets] Device Specific APIs and Services
[Widgets] Requirements LC
[Widgets] Requirements LC
[selectors-api] What's the final call on NSResolver?
[widgets] Minutes of 19 June 2008 Voice Conference
Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
ISSUE-9 (Wheeling Units): How should wheel events represent pixel/line wheeling units? [DOM3 Events]
Wheel events
[Progress Events] unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 18 June 2008 (Today!!)
IRC logging
[widgets] Widgets Requirements LC
[Widgets] Requirements LC
ISSUE-8 (mouseenter/leave): Adding mouseenter and mouseleave Events [DOM3 Events]
[widgets] icon text
Tracker RSS and API (was Re: ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products])
Possible test for DOM Events
ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products]
FW: [Adding mouseenter and mouseleave events]
Plans for after F2F?
New Progress Events editor's draft
ISSUE-6 (Element Traversal Nodelist): Should the ElementTraversal Interface Have a Nodelist? [Element Traversal]
ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
Fwd: Registration now open for the Combined Technical Plenary and Advisory Committee Meeting
Improving Communication and Expectations (was: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests])
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations (was: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests])
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
[widgets] Requirements document is ready for Last Call WD publication
[widgets] Minutes from 12 June 2008 Voice Conference
[XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
Re: [Progress events] There is no way to create progress events using document.createEvent
ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]
Re: Progress Events
Re: [progress-events] loaded member misnamed?
[WebIDL] Assigning to constants
Re: [XHR] Sending a Document with a mismatched encoding
Re: [XHR] (Late) LC Comments
Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
Re: [XHR] Last Call comment on about dependencies
Re: LC comments.
<Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- RE: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- RE: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- RE: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- Re: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- RE: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- RE: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- RE: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- Issues and Actions (was: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues)
- Re: Issues and Actions (was: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues)
- Re: Issues and Actions
- Re: Issues and Actions
- Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- RE: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- RE: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
[Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
ISSUE-2 (OnFoo Attributes): Event Handler Attributes (onfoo Attributes) and Add/Remove Event Listener [DOM3 Events]
DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)
- Re: DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)
- Re: DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)
- [minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 11 June 2008
Mass Subscription, and How to Unsubscribe
[XHR] SVG WG LC comments
Re: [AC] URI canonicalization problem with Access-Control-Policy-Path
Transitioning to WebApps Mailing List
Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes