- From: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:06:55 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Zhenbin Xu <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team <ieajax@microsoft.com>
Then I definitely would recommend an Exception. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 7:05 PM > To: Zhenbin Xu > Cc: Jonas Sicking; Sunava Dutta; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX > SWAT Team > Subject: RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: > Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC > Test Suite > > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Zhenbin Xu wrote: > > > > I once again propose the spec simply state "null or exception" with > > sufficient explanations. > > I don't really mind if it is null or an exception, but simply allowing > both isn't going to get us interoperability, so I'm against that. The > whole point of a spec is to avoid cases where different browsers do > different things like this. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. > fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ > ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`- > .;.'
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 02:07:37 UTC