Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal] from Anne van Kesteren on 2008-06-22 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2008)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:15:57 +0200
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uc5rgvq464w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:18:45 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>  
wrote:
> Anne's proposed solution is not valid either, except when applied to
> DOM Core, rescinding EntityReference nodes alltogether, as the issue is
> about how to implement this interface if you do have EntityReference
> nodes in the tree (or want your code to work whether or not you do).

My proposal is indeed to fix DOM Core.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Sunday, 22 June 2008 16:15:26 UTC