Re: Agenda and logistics...

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:43:38 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <>  

> On Jun 23, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> the agenda and logistics page for the meeting will be shortly available  
>> to working group members (Sunava, can you please ask your AC rep to  
>> ensure that you guys have joined by the time we have the meeting?).
> I would like to request an additional agenda item. There is already a  
> block of time for discussing Microsoft's feedback on XHR2+AC. I would  
> like to request a separate block of time for discussion among those  
> looking to implement or use XHR2+AC, so that we can come to rough  
> consensus on the key remaining open issues.

Sorry, I wasn't that clear, but that is what I meant in the agenda on day  
3, by XHR specs.

> Since Microsoft has announced that they plan to stick with XDR  
> (< 
>  >), I assume they are not interested in being part of this consensus.  
> But I still think we need to have this item on the agenda, and of course  
> representatives from Microsoft are welcome to observe this discussion.

Assuming they have made the patent policy commitment and joined the group  
by then they are even welcome to take part ;)

> Perhaps we could devote a day or half day to this topic, rather than  
> devoting 2 days to XHR1 issues. Perhaps (given Microsoft's request) we  
> can discuss Microsoft's feedback on Tuesday, XHR2+AC issues on  
> Wednesday, and XHR1 issues on Thursday.

Yep. I am waiting for people to comment on whether they are happy to roll  
up about 11 on Tuesday, or would prefer to have the meeting start early  
without me - I am happy either way, but so far only Sunava has actually  
made a clear statement so I am looking for a couple more concrete answers  
- then I will update the agenda properly too.



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk   Try Opera 9.5:

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 04:26:17 UTC