Monday, 30 June 2008
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- heads-up: /2006/webapi/Binding4DOM moved to /2006/webapi/WebIDL
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- [D3E] Multiple keyboard identifiers
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
Sunday, 29 June 2008
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]
Saturday, 28 June 2008
- Re: [AC] Hardening against DNS rebinding attacks - proposal
- Re: [AC] Hardening against DNS rebinding attacks - proposal
- Re: [AC] Hardening against DNS rebinding attacks - proposal
- Re: How Open is Open?
Friday, 27 June 2008
- Re: [AC] Hardening against DNS rebinding attacks - proposal
- [AC] Hardening against DNS rebinding attacks - proposal
- Re: [widgets] Minutes of 26 June 2008 Voice Conference
- ISSUE-22 (Is SHA1 good enough?): Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures?
- RE: Agenda+ DOM3 Events (was: Agenda and logistics...)
- ISSUE-21: should Widgets 1.0 allow fallback for <content> element? [Widgets]
- ISSUE-20 (Content multi-view): Current <content> model does not allow multiple views [Widgets]
- ISSUE-19: Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required use cases and requirements [Widgets]
Thursday, 26 June 2008
- Re: Using #waf for June 26 Widgets Call [Was: Agenda for 26 June 2008 Widgets Voice Conference]
- Re: Using #waf for June 26 Widgets Call [Was: Agenda for 26 June 2008 Widgets Voice Conference]
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: ISSUE-18 (api-availability): Need to efine a mechanism to check for the availability of an API [Widgets]
- ISSUE-18 (api-availability): Need to efine a mechanism to check for the availability of an API [Widgets]
- [widgets] Minutes of 26 June 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: Call for Review: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Requirements
- ProgressEvent unification / loaded attribute / "stalled" event
- ISSUE-17: Widgets (not just widget engines) should be able to specify which proxies they communicate through
- ISSUE-16: Do widgets need their own URI scheme? [Widgets]
- ISSUE-15: Allow or deny installing additional digital certificates on widget engines? [Widgets]
- [widgets] Timeless' Widgets Requirements LC
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- RE: F2F Agenda Updated
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: F2F Agenda Updated
- Re: F2F Agenda Updated
- Re: Call for Review: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Requirements
Wednesday, 25 June 2008
- F2F Agenda Updated
- Re: Agenda+ DOM3 Events (was: Agenda and logistics...)
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Process Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy
- RE: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Process Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy
- Re: Process Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Process Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Possible test for DOM Events
- Reminder: DOM3 Events Telcon Cancelled, Resumes in 2 Weeks
- Re: [XHR] Last Call comment on about dependencies
- Re: Call for Review: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Requirements
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- [Widgets] Requirements LC Comment Tracker
- Agenda+ DOM3 Events (was: Agenda and logistics...)
- Re: Call for Review: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Requirements
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
Tuesday, 24 June 2008
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Call for Review: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Requirements
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- [XHR2] xhr.upload and abort and error events
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Initial input for discussion of Widget security model
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
Monday, 23 June 2008
- Re: Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6 (was: ElementTraversal progress?)
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- Re: ISSUE-10 (client-server): Client and Server model [Access Control]
- Re: ISSUE-10 (client-server): Client and Server model [Access Control]
- Re: ISSUE-12 (access-control-policy-path): IIS and Access-Control-Policy-Path [Access Control]
- [XHR2] upload complete flag
- Re: Origin (was: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback)
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: Origin (was: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback)
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- ISSUE-14 (opt-into-methods-headers): Opting into methods/headers [Access Control]
- ISSUE-13 (opting-into-cookies): Opting into cookies [Access Control]
- ISSUE-12 (access-control-policy-path): IIS and Access-Control-Policy-Path [Access Control]
- ISSUE-11 (security-model): What is the Security Model for the access-control spec? [Access Control]
- Re: IRC logging
- ISSUE-10 (client-server): Client and Server model [Access Control]
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- RE: Agenda and logistics...
- Re: Agenda and logistics...
- Agenda and logistics...
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- Re: ElementTraversal progress?
- Re: ElementTraversal progress?
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
Sunday, 22 June 2008
- [XHR] Request charset is limited to UTF-8 for x-www-form-urlencoded data
- Re: [widgets] icon text
- Re: IRC logging
- Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: Origin (was: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback)
- Re: Origin (was: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback)
- Re: [widgets] icon text
Saturday, 21 June 2008
- Re: Origin (was: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback)
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]
- Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- Re: Origin (was: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback)
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: IRC logging
- Re: [widgets] icon text
- Re: Wheel events (ISSUE-9)
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- Re: [widgets] Device Specific APIs and Services
Friday, 20 June 2008
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: IRC logging
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: IRC logging
- Re: ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products]
- Re: [widgets] Device Specific APIs and Services
- Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
- Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
- [widgets] Device Specific APIs and Services
- Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
- Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
- [Widgets] Requirements LC
- [Widgets] Requirements LC
- [selectors-api] What's the final call on NSResolver?
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
Thursday, 19 June 2008
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- RE: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- RE: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- RE: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- [widgets] Minutes of 19 June 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: IRC logging
Wednesday, 18 June 2008
Thursday, 19 June 2008
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
- Opting in to cookies - proposal version 3
Wednesday, 18 June 2008
- Re: [widgets] icon text
- Re: [widgets] icon text
- Re: Wheel events (ISSUE-9)
- Re: Wheel events (ISSUE-9)
- Re: Wheel events
- ISSUE-9 (Wheeling Units): How should wheel events represent pixel/line wheeling units? [DOM3 Events]
- Wheel events
- Re: IRC logging
- [minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 18 June 2008
- RE: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: Possible test for DOM Events
- Re: IRC logging
- [Progress Events] unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 18 June 2008 (Today!!)
- Re: [Widgets] Requirements LC
- IRC logging
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- [widgets] Widgets Requirements LC
- [Widgets] Requirements LC
- ISSUE-8 (mouseenter/leave): Adding mouseenter and mouseleave Events [DOM3 Events]
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
Tuesday, 17 June 2008
- [widgets] icon text
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] [D3E]
- Re: ISSUE-6 (Element Traversal Nodelist): Should the ElementTraversal Interface Have a Nodelist? [Element Traversal]
- RE: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products]
- Re: ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: Tracker RSS and API (was Re: ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products])
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Tracker RSS and API (was Re: ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products])
- Possible test for DOM Events
- ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products]
- Re: Registration now open for the Combined Technical Plenary and Advisory Committee Meeting
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- Re: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: [access-control] header black list
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: Issues and Actions
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
- Re: Issues and Actions
- Re: Issues and Actions (was: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues)
- [access-control] header black list
- Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
- Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- responseXML/responseText exceptions and parseError
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] [D3E]
- Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
- Re: FW: [Adding mouseenter and mouseleave events]
- Re: Plans for after F2F?
- Re: FW: [Adding mouseenter and mouseleave events]
- Re: Plans for after F2F?
- Re: New Progress Events editor's draft
- FW: [Adding mouseenter and mouseleave events]
- Plans for after F2F?
- New Progress Events editor's draft
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- ISSUE-6 (Element Traversal Nodelist): Should the ElementTraversal Interface Have a Nodelist? [Element Traversal]
- ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- ISSUE-4 (SpecContent): Should specifications decide what counts as content for transfer? [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] [D3E]
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Fwd: Registration now open for the Combined Technical Plenary and Advisory Committee Meeting
- Issues and Actions (was: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues)
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues
- Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
Monday, 16 June 2008
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- RE: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- RE: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)
- RE: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- RE: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- Re: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- RE: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: TRACK, was: LC comments.
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations (was: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests])
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations
- Re: Improving Communication and Expectations (was: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests])
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- RE: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Improving Communication and Expectations (was: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests])
- Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: [progress-events] loaded member misnamed?
Saturday, 14 June 2008
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Opting in to cookies - proposal
Friday, 13 June 2008
- Opting in to cookies - proposal
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: TRACK, was: LC comments.
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: TRACK, was: LC comments.
- Re: TRACK, was: LC comments.
- Re: TRACK, was: LC comments.
- Re: TRACK, was: LC comments.
- RE: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: TRACK, was: LC comments.
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- TRACK, was: LC comments.
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- Re: [progress-events] loaded member misnamed?
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- [widgets] Requirements document is ready for Last Call WD publication
- Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- [widgets] Minutes from 12 June 2008 Voice Conference
- [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group
- Re: LC comments.
- Re: [Progress events] There is no way to create progress events using document.createEvent
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- ISSUE-3 (eventType): [Progress] eventType [Progress events]
- Re: Progress Events
- Re: [progress-events] loaded member misnamed?
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: LC comments.
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
Thursday, 12 June 2008
Friday, 13 June 2008
Thursday, 12 June 2008
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] (Late) LC Comments
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] (Late) LC Comments
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- [WebIDL] Assigning to constants
- Re: [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [XHR] (Late) LC Comments
- Re: [XHR] Sending a Document with a mismatched encoding
- Re: [XHR] (Late) LC Comments
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- Re: [XHR] Last Call comment on about dependencies
- Re: LC comments.
- Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- <Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
- RE: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
Wednesday, 11 June 2008
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: [AC] URI canonicalization problem with Access-Control-Policy-Path
- Re: Mass Subscription, and How to Unsubscribe
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- [minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 11 June 2008
- Re: [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- [Fwd: Offline data synchronization API]
- Re: Mass Subscription, and How to Unsubscribe
- Re: ISSUE-2 (OnFoo Attributes): Event Handler Attributes (onfoo Attributes) and Add/Remove Event Listener [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-2 (OnFoo Attributes): Event Handler Attributes (onfoo Attributes) and Add/Remove Event Listener [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-2 (OnFoo Attributes): Event Handler Attributes (onfoo Attributes) and Add/Remove Event Listener [DOM3 Events]
- Re: DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)
- Re: DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)
- DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)
- Mass Subscription, and How to Unsubscribe
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- [XHR] SVG WG LC comments
- Re: [AC] URI canonicalization problem with Access-Control-Policy-Path
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
Tuesday, 10 June 2008
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Re: Transitioning to WebApps Mailing List
- Re: Transitioning to WebApps Mailing List
- Re: Transitioning to WebApps Mailing List
- Transitioning to WebApps Mailing List
- Re: [AC] Helping server admins not making mistakes
- Welcome to the WebApps WG
- ISSUE-1 (Fix the Spec): DOM3 Events is Unfinished [DOM3 Events]