- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:18:45 +0200
- To: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
* Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >Simon Pieters suggests wording similar to HTML5, in ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0191.html>. That is not a technically valid solution (and that particular wording does not, in fact, apply to the core node traversal interfaces, if you implement, say, .nextSibling as if entities had been expanded, entities have in fact been expanded). Anne's proposed solution is not valid either, except when applied to DOM Core, rescinding EntityReference nodes alltogether, as the issue is about how to implement this interface if you do have EntityReference nodes in the tree (or want your code to work whether or not you do). By the way, I would strongly recommend to use Subject header values no longer than ~50-60 bytes as longer ones trigger serious bugs in many mail clients, and would also strongly recommend to wrap lines in the body after ~70 characters. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2008 22:19:22 UTC