- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:33:25 +1000
- To: "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
If not supported already, what would make the tracker really useful would be: 1. RSS support (per product, person, etc) 2. a web API (JSON in particular) With an API, editor's could mash up issues into specs (eg. as a table, or inline where needed). Personally, the problem I find with the tracker is that it is "out-of-sight-out-of-mind". As an editor, if I could track issues and actions directly in the spec, that would be really useful and I would be much more inclined to use it. Could these features be added? Kind regards, Marcos On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products] > > http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/ > > Raised by: Doug Schepers > On product: All Products > > Should We transfer old issues from WebAPI and WAF to this Tracker? > > > > > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au http://standardssuck.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2008 22:34:14 UTC